Legal Validity of Authentic Deeds Based on Cyber Notary According to Law Number 2 of 2014 Concerning The Position of A Notary

Tiara Novita Aisyah Putri, Sinta Annisa Qotrunnada, Habibah Fatihatur Rizqo, Hais Subaga Athazada Athazada, Miqdad Nidhom Fahmi
{"title":"Legal Validity of Authentic Deeds Based on Cyber Notary According to Law Number 2 of 2014 Concerning The Position of A Notary","authors":"Tiara Novita Aisyah Putri, Sinta Annisa Qotrunnada, Habibah Fatihatur Rizqo, Hais Subaga Athazada Athazada, Miqdad Nidhom Fahmi","doi":"10.38035/jlph.v4i4.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of information technology has had a significant impact on the field of notarial law, giving rise to the concept of cyber notary as a response to electronic transactions. Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notaries (UUJN) regulates the authority of notaries in dealing with electronic transactions. Notaries have the authority to certify electronic transactions, as regulated in Article 15 paragraph (3) UUJN. However, the legal validity of authentic deeds based on cyber notary is the subject of a complex debate. The research method used is through a normative juridical approach using a statutory approach and literature study. This article analyzes various aspects related to forced takeovers of companies. The research results show that first, the notary's authority to certify electronic transactions allows the adoption of information technology to ensure legal certainty. Notaries can use cyber notary technology to carry out their duties efficiently and responsive to current developments, providing legal certainty in electronic transactions. Second, the validity of the deed made through a cyber notary must meet the authenticity standards regulated by law. Even though technology enables efficiency, the physical presence of a notary in the deed reading process is still important to ensure the validity and correctness of the contents of the deed. The use of a cyber notary in making Partij Deeds becomes more complicated because the process depends on the notary's ability to accurately record the wishes of the parties. Therefore, notary adaptation to advances in information technology requires adjustments to clear rules and guidelines. There needs to be further clarification in the UUJN to regulate the use of cyber notaries in the context of making deeds by notaries to accommodate technical and legal challenges in the current digital era. In this way, legal certainty in electronic transactions can be guaranteed by legal standards recognized by law.","PeriodicalId":397335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities","volume":"120 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of information technology has had a significant impact on the field of notarial law, giving rise to the concept of cyber notary as a response to electronic transactions. Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notaries (UUJN) regulates the authority of notaries in dealing with electronic transactions. Notaries have the authority to certify electronic transactions, as regulated in Article 15 paragraph (3) UUJN. However, the legal validity of authentic deeds based on cyber notary is the subject of a complex debate. The research method used is through a normative juridical approach using a statutory approach and literature study. This article analyzes various aspects related to forced takeovers of companies. The research results show that first, the notary's authority to certify electronic transactions allows the adoption of information technology to ensure legal certainty. Notaries can use cyber notary technology to carry out their duties efficiently and responsive to current developments, providing legal certainty in electronic transactions. Second, the validity of the deed made through a cyber notary must meet the authenticity standards regulated by law. Even though technology enables efficiency, the physical presence of a notary in the deed reading process is still important to ensure the validity and correctness of the contents of the deed. The use of a cyber notary in making Partij Deeds becomes more complicated because the process depends on the notary's ability to accurately record the wishes of the parties. Therefore, notary adaptation to advances in information technology requires adjustments to clear rules and guidelines. There needs to be further clarification in the UUJN to regulate the use of cyber notaries in the context of making deeds by notaries to accommodate technical and legal challenges in the current digital era. In this way, legal certainty in electronic transactions can be guaranteed by legal standards recognized by law.
根据 2014 年第 2 号关于公证人地位的法律,基于网络公证的真实契约的法律效力
信息技术的发展对公证法领域产生了重大影响,产生了网络公证的概念,作为对电子交易的回应。关于公证人地位的 2014 年第 2 号法律(UUJN)规定了公证人处理电子交易的权力。根据 UUJN 第 15 条第(3)款的规定,公证人有权对电子交易进行认证。然而,基于网络公证的真实契约的法律效力是一个复杂的辩论主题。本文采用的研究方法是使用法定方法和文献研究的规范法学方法。本文分析了与强制收购公司相关的各个方面。研究结果表明,首先,公证人对电子交易的认证权允许采用信息技术来确保法律的确定性。公证人可以利用网络公证技术高效履行职责,并顺应时代发展,为电子交易提供法律确定性。其次,通过网络公证做出的契约的有效性必须符合法律规定的真实性标准。尽管技术可以提高效率,但公证人在阅读契约过程中的实际存在对于确保契约内容的有效性和正确性仍然非常重要。使用网络公证人制作 Partij 契约变得更加复杂,因为这一过程取决于公证人准确记录当事人意愿的能力。因此,要使公证适应信息技术的进步,就必须调整明确的规则和准则。UUJN 需要进一步澄清,在公证人制作契约的背景下规范网络公证的使用,以适应当前数字时代的技术和法律挑战。这样,电子交易的法律确定性才能得到法律认可的法律标准的保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信