Design issues concerning circular economy assessment methods at the product level: a comparative analysis through a case study of a mobile tiny house

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Design Science Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1017/dsj.2024.12
L. Ruiz-Pastor, S. Altavilla, Y. Borgianni
{"title":"Design issues concerning circular economy assessment methods at the product level: a comparative analysis through a case study of a mobile tiny house","authors":"L. Ruiz-Pastor, S. Altavilla, Y. Borgianni","doi":"10.1017/dsj.2024.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sustainability evaluations are increasingly relevant in the design of products. Within sustainability-related frameworks, circular economy (CE) has gained attention in the last few years, and this has vastly affected design, leading, for example, to design for circularity. This article deals with the wide range of product-level CE assessment tools, out of which some are applied to a case study from the building sector, namely a tiny house made with hemp bricks. Attention was specifically paid to those methods through which a single circularity indicator could be extrapolated. Overall, the objective of this work is to study the convergence of existing CE assessment methods in providing consistent circularity performances. The results show similarities in the overall circularity scores despite differences in the variables used to achieve that final score. Thus, despite the lack of standard methods, the results suggest that many of these tools are sufficiently interchangeable, also in consideration of consistent indications to improve the circularity of the tiny house. This means that consistent inputs are provided to anyone willing to redesign the tiny house with the objective of making it more circular irrespective of the assessment tool used.","PeriodicalId":54146,"journal":{"name":"Design Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2024.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Sustainability evaluations are increasingly relevant in the design of products. Within sustainability-related frameworks, circular economy (CE) has gained attention in the last few years, and this has vastly affected design, leading, for example, to design for circularity. This article deals with the wide range of product-level CE assessment tools, out of which some are applied to a case study from the building sector, namely a tiny house made with hemp bricks. Attention was specifically paid to those methods through which a single circularity indicator could be extrapolated. Overall, the objective of this work is to study the convergence of existing CE assessment methods in providing consistent circularity performances. The results show similarities in the overall circularity scores despite differences in the variables used to achieve that final score. Thus, despite the lack of standard methods, the results suggest that many of these tools are sufficiently interchangeable, also in consideration of consistent indications to improve the circularity of the tiny house. This means that consistent inputs are provided to anyone willing to redesign the tiny house with the objective of making it more circular irrespective of the assessment tool used.
与产品层面的循环经济评估方法有关的设计问题:通过移动式小房子的案例研究进行比较分析
摘要 可持续性评估与产品设计的关系日益密切。在与可持续性相关的框架内,循环经济(CE)在过去几年中得到了广泛关注,并对设计产生了巨大影响,例如,循环性设计。本文介绍了一系列产品层面的 CE 评估工具,其中一些应用于建筑领域的案例研究,即用麻砖建造的小房子。文章特别关注那些可以推断出单一循环性指标的方法。总之,这项工作的目的是研究现有的 CE 评估方法在提供一致的循环性能方面的趋同性。结果表明,尽管用于实现最终得分的变量存在差异,但总体循环性得分具有相似性。因此,尽管缺乏标准方法,但结果表明,这些工具中的许多都有足够的互换性,也考虑到了改善小房子循环性的一致指标。这意味着,无论使用哪种评估工具,都可以为任何愿意重新设计小房子的人提供一致的意见,使其更具循环性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Design Science
Design Science ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
审稿时长
22 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信