A Review Based on Various Applications to Find a Consistent Pairwise Comparison Matrix

IF 0.9 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Shalu Kaushik, Sangeeta Pant, L. K. Joshi, Anuj Kumar, Mangey Ram
{"title":"A Review Based on Various Applications to Find a Consistent Pairwise Comparison Matrix","authors":"Shalu Kaushik, Sangeeta Pant, L. K. Joshi, Anuj Kumar, Mangey Ram","doi":"10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is a crucial process that provides a systematic approach to resolving numerous challenging problems encountered in everyday life. An effective method for addressing such MCDM challenges is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Within AHP, the resolution of these problems relies on the Pairwise Comparison Matrix (PCM), a pivotal component of the decision-making framework. A fundamental aspect of AHP lies in ensuring the consistency of the comparison matrix to validate the logical perspective of the respondents. An inconsistent matrix undermines its utility as a reference for decision-making, underscoring the significance of achieving consistency in the PCM as a pivotal stage in the decision-making process. In this discourse, we delve into various methodologies aimed at deriving a refined and consistent PCM capable of replacing the original inconsistent version. To facilitate comprehension, we categorize the references based on proposed approaches and specific focal points.","PeriodicalId":42526,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is a crucial process that provides a systematic approach to resolving numerous challenging problems encountered in everyday life. An effective method for addressing such MCDM challenges is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Within AHP, the resolution of these problems relies on the Pairwise Comparison Matrix (PCM), a pivotal component of the decision-making framework. A fundamental aspect of AHP lies in ensuring the consistency of the comparison matrix to validate the logical perspective of the respondents. An inconsistent matrix undermines its utility as a reference for decision-making, underscoring the significance of achieving consistency in the PCM as a pivotal stage in the decision-making process. In this discourse, we delve into various methodologies aimed at deriving a refined and consistent PCM capable of replacing the original inconsistent version. To facilitate comprehension, we categorize the references based on proposed approaches and specific focal points.
基于各种应用寻找一致的配对比较矩阵的综述
多标准决策(MCDM)是一个重要的过程,它为解决日常生活中遇到的众多挑战性问题提供了一种系统的方法。层次分析法(AHP)是解决此类 MCDM 挑战的有效方法。在 AHP 中,这些问题的解决依赖于配对比较矩阵(PCM),它是决策框架的关键组成部分。AHP 的一个基本方面在于确保比较矩阵的一致性,以验证受访者的逻辑观点。不一致的矩阵会削弱其作为决策参考的效用,这就强调了实现 PCM 的一致性作为决策过程关键阶段的重要性。在本讨论中,我们将深入探讨各种方法,旨在得出一个完善且一致的 PCM,以取代原来不一致的版本。为便于理解,我们根据建议的方法和具体重点对参考文献进行了分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信