CALCULATING THE CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: THE CASE OF TED DİYARBAKIR COLLEGE (TÜRKİYE

Sena Ozerdem, M. S. Ozerdem
{"title":"CALCULATING THE CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: THE CASE OF TED DİYARBAKIR COLLEGE (TÜRKİYE","authors":"Sena Ozerdem, M. S. Ozerdem","doi":"10.56131/pstp.2024.28.1.257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is crucial to promote awareness, particularly throughout society, regarding a topic that holds significant importance for our environment. This study was undertaken with the intention of making a contribution to research on carbon footprint, driven by this motive. In this study, the carbon footprint calculation of TED Diyarbakır (Türkiye) College was made using the IPCC Tier approach. The carbon footprint of 3 different capabilities, namely scope 1 (Natural gas, gasoline, diesel, fire extinguishers), scope 2 (electric) and scope 3 (Water consumption, services), were calculated. When Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 are evaluated together, it is seen that the amount of carbon footprint originating from Scope 1 is higher. Sources of emissions from Scope 1 include natural gas consumption, diesel and gasoline fuel consumption, as well as fire extinguishers. When the emission sources in the college were compared, it was determined that the highest carbon footprint was due to natural gas consumption within scope 1 (97.98%). Subsequently, it was determined that the carbon footprint was caused by existing vehicle shuttle within scope 3 (1.917%). Finally, it has been determined that the carbon footprint is caused by the existing electricity consumption within scope 2 (0.1%). It is stated that there are 2 reasons for the low carbon footprint caused by electricity consumption. The first is that the equipment used in lighting is LED, and the second is that there is no need for lighting fixtures due to the long lighting time of the day in our geography","PeriodicalId":444383,"journal":{"name":"PROFESSIONAL STUDIES: THEORY AND PRACTICE","volume":"73 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROFESSIONAL STUDIES: THEORY AND PRACTICE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56131/pstp.2024.28.1.257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is crucial to promote awareness, particularly throughout society, regarding a topic that holds significant importance for our environment. This study was undertaken with the intention of making a contribution to research on carbon footprint, driven by this motive. In this study, the carbon footprint calculation of TED Diyarbakır (Türkiye) College was made using the IPCC Tier approach. The carbon footprint of 3 different capabilities, namely scope 1 (Natural gas, gasoline, diesel, fire extinguishers), scope 2 (electric) and scope 3 (Water consumption, services), were calculated. When Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 are evaluated together, it is seen that the amount of carbon footprint originating from Scope 1 is higher. Sources of emissions from Scope 1 include natural gas consumption, diesel and gasoline fuel consumption, as well as fire extinguishers. When the emission sources in the college were compared, it was determined that the highest carbon footprint was due to natural gas consumption within scope 1 (97.98%). Subsequently, it was determined that the carbon footprint was caused by existing vehicle shuttle within scope 3 (1.917%). Finally, it has been determined that the carbon footprint is caused by the existing electricity consumption within scope 2 (0.1%). It is stated that there are 2 reasons for the low carbon footprint caused by electricity consumption. The first is that the equipment used in lighting is LED, and the second is that there is no need for lighting fixtures due to the long lighting time of the day in our geography
计算碳足迹以实现环境可持续性:TED DIODEYARBAKIR 学院(土耳其)的案例
提高人们,特别是全社会对这一对我们的环境具有重要意义的课题的认识至关重要。在这一动机的推动下,本研究旨在为碳足迹研究做出贡献。本研究采用 IPCC Tier 方法对迪亚巴克尔(土耳其)TED 学院进行了碳足迹计算。计算了 3 种不同能力的碳足迹,即范围 1(天然气、汽油、柴油、灭火器)、范围 2(电)和范围 3(水消耗、服务)。将范围 1、范围 2 和范围 3 结合起来评估,可以看出,范围 1 产生的碳足迹较多。范围 1 的排放源包括天然气消耗、柴油和汽油燃料消耗以及灭火器。对学院的排放源进行比较后发现,碳足迹最大的是范围 1 中的天然气消耗(97.98%)。随后,在范围 3(1.917%)中,现有车辆穿梭造成了碳足迹。最后,碳足迹是由范围 2 中现有的电力消耗造成的(0.1%)。电力消耗造成的碳足迹较低有两个原因。一是照明设备使用的是 LED,二是我们的地理位置一天中的照明时间较长,不需要照明灯具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信