Examining the relationship between environmental management accounting practices and return on equity in the South African chemical industry

Q3 Social Sciences
Tracy Cornellissen, S. Mukwarami
{"title":"Examining the relationship between environmental management accounting practices and return on equity in the South African chemical industry","authors":"Tracy Cornellissen, S. Mukwarami","doi":"10.21511/ee.15(1).2024.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental management accounting practices (EMAPs) have become pervasive, and continued efforts to ensure universal implementation across various sectors often represent financial implications for organizations. Despite many studies that examined the relationship between EMAPs and financial performance, the debate is still inconclusive. Therefore, the study paves the way for chemical firms to explore the effectiveness of EMAPs’ implementation for both financial and environmental gain. The study used purposive sampling to gather quantitative secondary data from annual integrated reports of chemical firms to examine the relationship between EMAPs and financial performance in the South African chemical industries during 2016–2022. Following the results from the regression estimations, two of the EMAPs – water and energy usage – have had a positive relationship with financial performance, with the latter being highly significant. Contradictorily, carbon emissions and environmental expenditure adversely and insignificantly influenced financial performance. The results suggest that chemical firms have in place ineffective carbon management strategies that fail to generate sustainable returns. Overall, the results acknowledge the efforts of chemical industries in making substantial contributions to enhance environmental performance and encourage environmentalists and policymakers to reconfigure environmental policies for improved environmental and financial performance. Further research on environmental management accounting (EMA) barriers in chemical industries is imperative to achieving environmental sustainability.","PeriodicalId":52974,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Economics","volume":"113 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.15(1).2024.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental management accounting practices (EMAPs) have become pervasive, and continued efforts to ensure universal implementation across various sectors often represent financial implications for organizations. Despite many studies that examined the relationship between EMAPs and financial performance, the debate is still inconclusive. Therefore, the study paves the way for chemical firms to explore the effectiveness of EMAPs’ implementation for both financial and environmental gain. The study used purposive sampling to gather quantitative secondary data from annual integrated reports of chemical firms to examine the relationship between EMAPs and financial performance in the South African chemical industries during 2016–2022. Following the results from the regression estimations, two of the EMAPs – water and energy usage – have had a positive relationship with financial performance, with the latter being highly significant. Contradictorily, carbon emissions and environmental expenditure adversely and insignificantly influenced financial performance. The results suggest that chemical firms have in place ineffective carbon management strategies that fail to generate sustainable returns. Overall, the results acknowledge the efforts of chemical industries in making substantial contributions to enhance environmental performance and encourage environmentalists and policymakers to reconfigure environmental policies for improved environmental and financial performance. Further research on environmental management accounting (EMA) barriers in chemical industries is imperative to achieving environmental sustainability.
研究南非化工行业环境管理会计实践与股本回报率之间的关系
环境管理会计实务(EMAPs)已成为一种普遍现象,为确保在各行各业普遍实施而不断做出的努力往往对各组织产生财务影响。尽管有许多研究探讨了环境管理会计实务与财务业绩之间的关系,但争论仍无定论。因此,本研究为化工企业探索实施环境管理行动计划对财务和环境收益的有效性铺平了道路。本研究采用目的性抽样,从化工企业的年度综合报告中收集定量二级数据,以研究 2016-2022 年期间南非化工行业的 EMAP 与财务业绩之间的关系。回归估计结果显示,水和能源使用量这两项EMAP与财务业绩呈正相关关系,其中后者具有高度显著性。与此相反,碳排放和环境支出对财务业绩的负面影响并不显著。结果表明,化工企业制定的碳管理战略效果不佳,无法产生可持续回报。总之,研究结果肯定了化工行业在提高环境绩效方面做出的巨大贡献,并鼓励环境学家和政策制定者重新制定环境政策,以提高环境和财务绩效。要实现环境的可持续发展,就必须进一步研究化工行业的环境管理会计(EMA)障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Economics
Environmental Economics Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信