A Systematic Review of Outdoor Thermal Comfort Studies for the Urban (Re)Design of City Squares

Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.3390/su16124920
Lazar Mandič, Aleksandra Đjukić, Jelena Marić, B. Mitrović
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Outdoor Thermal Comfort Studies for the Urban (Re)Design of City Squares","authors":"Lazar Mandič, Aleksandra Đjukić, Jelena Marić, B. Mitrović","doi":"10.3390/su16124920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the upcoming period, city squares’ urban redesign will be crucial in achieving sustainable development goals. This study presents a systematic review of OTC-related studies for the urban design of city squares using the PRISMA 2020 methodology. A review included a total of 173 papers from 2001 to 2023. The results identified five study types—clusters based on four pre-defined criteria: study approach, data collection methods, time duration, and primary objectives. The clusters indicate that more than half of all studies are related to the comparison of thermal comfort and heat mitigation measures. Most of the case studies were located in one of three climate zones: temperate oceanic (Cfb) (58 studies), hot summer Mediterranean (Csa) (40 studies), or humid subtropical (Cfa) (28 studies). The most common geometry of the analyzed urban square is medium-sized, is rectangular, and has dominant axel orientation south–north. Also, based on all five clusters, several research gaps were identified, appropriate for future research: the majority of studies related to the traditionally considered climate areas, no typology of urban square geometry configuration based on OTC assessment, and the lack of a local design model for assessing and improving the thermal comfort of city squares.","PeriodicalId":509360,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability","volume":" 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the upcoming period, city squares’ urban redesign will be crucial in achieving sustainable development goals. This study presents a systematic review of OTC-related studies for the urban design of city squares using the PRISMA 2020 methodology. A review included a total of 173 papers from 2001 to 2023. The results identified five study types—clusters based on four pre-defined criteria: study approach, data collection methods, time duration, and primary objectives. The clusters indicate that more than half of all studies are related to the comparison of thermal comfort and heat mitigation measures. Most of the case studies were located in one of three climate zones: temperate oceanic (Cfb) (58 studies), hot summer Mediterranean (Csa) (40 studies), or humid subtropical (Cfa) (28 studies). The most common geometry of the analyzed urban square is medium-sized, is rectangular, and has dominant axel orientation south–north. Also, based on all five clusters, several research gaps were identified, appropriate for future research: the majority of studies related to the traditionally considered climate areas, no typology of urban square geometry configuration based on OTC assessment, and the lack of a local design model for assessing and improving the thermal comfort of city squares.
针对城市广场(再)设计的室外热舒适度研究系统综述
在未来一段时间内,城市广场的城市再设计对于实现可持续发展目标至关重要。本研究采用 PRISMA 2020 方法,对有关城市广场城市设计的 OTC 相关研究进行了系统综述。综述包括 2001 年至 2023 年期间的 173 篇论文。结果根据四个预定义标准:研究方法、数据收集方法、持续时间和主要目标,确定了五种研究类型集群。这些分组表明,半数以上的研究与热舒适度和热缓解措施的比较有关。大多数案例研究位于三个气候区之一:温带海洋性气候(Cfb)(58 项研究)、炎热夏季地中海气候(Csa)(40 项研究)或亚热带湿润气候(Cfa)(28 项研究)。所分析的城市广场最常见的几何形状是中等大小的长方形,主要轴线方向为南北向。此外,在所有五个群组的基础上,还发现了一些适合未来研究的研究空白:大多数研究与传统上认为的气候区有关,没有基于 OTC 评估的城市广场几何配置类型,以及缺乏用于评估和改善城市广场热舒适度的本地设计模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信