Appraising the Conceptual and Lexical Retrieval in Persons with Fluent and Nonfluent Aphasia

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Deepak Puttanna, Lorine Little Theresa, Akshaya Swamy
{"title":"Appraising the Conceptual and Lexical Retrieval in Persons with Fluent and Nonfluent Aphasia","authors":"Deepak Puttanna, Lorine Little Theresa, Akshaya Swamy","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective  Conceptual knowledge refers to understanding and interpreting concepts and their relationships. Lexical knowledge is the knowledge that can be expressed through words. It entails meaning of words and their relationships. Word retrieval impairments are the most radical deficits that restrict communicative functions for individuals with aphasia. The current study aimed to compare the conceptual and linguistic impairments associated with fluent and nonfluent persons with aphasia (PWAs). Materials and Methods  A total of 15 PWAs were recruited for the study, out of which, 8 were fluent aphasia and 7 were nonfluent aphasia. One picture-based conceptual task (picture comparison judgments) and one verb-based linguistic task (word comparison judgments) were used as the experimental paradigm. Results and Conclusion  The findings of the study showed no significant difference in the performance of conceptual and lexical retrieval abilities in both fluent and nonfluent aphasia. The current study highlights the fact that both conceptual and lexical retrieval impairments prevail in both fluent and nonfluent aphasia.","PeriodicalId":40092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective  Conceptual knowledge refers to understanding and interpreting concepts and their relationships. Lexical knowledge is the knowledge that can be expressed through words. It entails meaning of words and their relationships. Word retrieval impairments are the most radical deficits that restrict communicative functions for individuals with aphasia. The current study aimed to compare the conceptual and linguistic impairments associated with fluent and nonfluent persons with aphasia (PWAs). Materials and Methods  A total of 15 PWAs were recruited for the study, out of which, 8 were fluent aphasia and 7 were nonfluent aphasia. One picture-based conceptual task (picture comparison judgments) and one verb-based linguistic task (word comparison judgments) were used as the experimental paradigm. Results and Conclusion  The findings of the study showed no significant difference in the performance of conceptual and lexical retrieval abilities in both fluent and nonfluent aphasia. The current study highlights the fact that both conceptual and lexical retrieval impairments prevail in both fluent and nonfluent aphasia.
评估流利性和非流利性失语症患者的概念和词汇检索能力
摘要 目的 概念知识是指理解和解释概念及其关系。词汇知识是可以通过词语表达的知识。它包括词语的含义及其关系。词汇检索障碍是限制失语症患者交流功能的最根本缺陷。本研究旨在比较流利型和非流利型失语症患者(PWAs)的概念障碍和语言障碍。材料与方法 本研究共招募了 15 名 PWA,其中 8 人为流利型失语症患者,7 人为非流利型失语症患者。实验范式包括一项以图片为基础的概念任务(图片比较判断)和一项以动词为基础的语言任务(词语比较判断)。结果与结论 研究结果显示,流利性失语症和非流利性失语症患者在概念和词汇检索能力方面的表现没有显著差异。本研究强调了一个事实,即流利性和非流利性失语症患者的概念和词汇检索能力均普遍受损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
85
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信