Comparative Outcomes of Propranolol Monotherapy and Combined Therapy with Intralesional Triamcinolone in Infantile Hemangioma

Shabnam Rashedi, Md. Tawhidul Islam, Manash Talukdar, Emon Kanti Moharer, Dibendu Kumar Das
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Propranolol Monotherapy and Combined Therapy with Intralesional Triamcinolone in Infantile Hemangioma","authors":"Shabnam Rashedi, Md. Tawhidul Islam, Manash Talukdar, Emon Kanti Moharer, Dibendu Kumar Das","doi":"10.9734/ajpr/2024/v14i7361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infantile Hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common vascular tumors of infancy. Oral propranolol has achieved great success in treating IHs since 2008. Recently combined oral propranolol with intralesional injection of Triamcinolone acetonide is the effective method of treatment for infantile Hemangioma with minimal adverse effects. \nObjectives: To observe the outcome of Propranolol monotherapy and combined therapy with intralesional Triamcinolone in Infantile Hemangioma. \nMaterials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out in the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Sylhet, during the period from January 2018 to December 2019. It included 42 infantile hemangioma patients divided into two groups: Group A (21) treated with oral propranolol, and Group B (21) treated with oral propranolol plus intralesional triamcinolone acetonide. Patients were followed up at regular intervals for 6 months. \nResults: The data of two groups of patients with IH were compared in the study. The demographic variables, including median age, sex, size, type, and site of IH, were comparable between the two groups. This showed that pre-treatment complications were slightly higher in Group B but not significantly different. Superior size reduction was observed in Group B (71.4% vs. 38.1%), though the difference was not significant statistically. Group B had excellent color regression, which was significantly higher compared to the other group (90.5% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001). The mean treatment cost was higher in Group B, which was 187.86. taka compared to 124.76. taka in Group A (P value was <0.001). In summary, Group B had better color regression of the pinprick but at a higher cost of treatment as compared to Group A, and other parameters were almost equal in both groups. \nConclusion: Combined propranolol and intralesional Triamcinolone is more effective compared to propranolol alone in the treatment of IHs.","PeriodicalId":393364,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pediatric Research","volume":" 53","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpr/2024/v14i7361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infantile Hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common vascular tumors of infancy. Oral propranolol has achieved great success in treating IHs since 2008. Recently combined oral propranolol with intralesional injection of Triamcinolone acetonide is the effective method of treatment for infantile Hemangioma with minimal adverse effects. Objectives: To observe the outcome of Propranolol monotherapy and combined therapy with intralesional Triamcinolone in Infantile Hemangioma. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out in the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Sylhet, during the period from January 2018 to December 2019. It included 42 infantile hemangioma patients divided into two groups: Group A (21) treated with oral propranolol, and Group B (21) treated with oral propranolol plus intralesional triamcinolone acetonide. Patients were followed up at regular intervals for 6 months. Results: The data of two groups of patients with IH were compared in the study. The demographic variables, including median age, sex, size, type, and site of IH, were comparable between the two groups. This showed that pre-treatment complications were slightly higher in Group B but not significantly different. Superior size reduction was observed in Group B (71.4% vs. 38.1%), though the difference was not significant statistically. Group B had excellent color regression, which was significantly higher compared to the other group (90.5% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001). The mean treatment cost was higher in Group B, which was 187.86. taka compared to 124.76. taka in Group A (P value was <0.001). In summary, Group B had better color regression of the pinprick but at a higher cost of treatment as compared to Group A, and other parameters were almost equal in both groups. Conclusion: Combined propranolol and intralesional Triamcinolone is more effective compared to propranolol alone in the treatment of IHs.
婴儿血管瘤中普萘洛尔单药治疗与曲安奈德内注射联合治疗的疗效比较
背景:婴儿血管瘤(IHs)是婴儿期最常见的血管肿瘤。自 2008 年以来,口服普萘洛尔在治疗 IHs 方面取得了巨大成功。最近,口服普萘洛尔与曲安奈德醋酸泼尼松内注射联合疗法是治疗婴儿血管瘤的有效方法,且不良反应极小。研究目的观察普萘洛尔单药治疗和曲安奈德联合治疗婴儿血管瘤的疗效。材料与方法:这项前瞻性研究于 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在锡尔赫特 MAG Osmani 医学院附属医院小儿外科开展。42名婴儿血管瘤患者被分为两组:A 组(21 人)接受口服普萘洛尔治疗,B 组(21 人)接受口服普萘洛尔加注射曲安奈德治疗。每隔 6 个月对患者进行定期随访。研究结果研究比较了两组 IH 患者的数据。两组患者的中位年龄、性别、IH大小、类型和部位等人口统计学变量具有可比性。结果显示,B 组患者治疗前的并发症略高,但无明显差异。观察到 B 组的体积缩小效果更好(71.4% 对 38.1%),但在统计学上差异不明显。B 组的退色效果极佳,明显高于其他组(90.5% 对 9.5%,P < 0.001)。B 组的平均治疗费用较高,为 187.86 塔卡,而 A 组为 124.76 塔卡(P 值小于 0.001)。总之,与 A 组相比,B 组的针刺消色效果更好,但治疗费用更高,而两组的其他参数几乎相同。结论联合使用普萘洛尔和曲安奈德治疗 IHs 比单独使用普萘洛尔更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信