New Local History projects in the unofficial history of the city: The case of St. Petersburg

Anna Troitskaya
{"title":"New Local History projects in the unofficial history of the city: The case of St. Petersburg","authors":"Anna Troitskaya","doi":"10.14746/strp.2024.49.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of interpreting local history is relevant to St. Petersburg, as to many other major historical cities. This article examines phenomena united by the concepts of local (spatial) myth and urban narrative, which go beyond official discourse. Alternative images of the city, based on its concealed places of interest contrast with one of the most widespread representations of St. Petersburg – its association with the heritage of imperial culture. The selection of memorable places and stories shifts from recognizable city landmarks to other objects that reveal the history and image of particular St. Petersburg sites, people’s daily lives and peripheral issues of urban life. This approach to the exploration of urban space, a phenomenon called New Local History, is presented and explained in the article as the rediscovery of the historical potential of the city. The examples given in the article also show the possible role of New Local History in encouraging residents to develop an interest in their own history, in the problems of modernity and in participating in socially significant projects. Trends in interaction with urban space and memory practices that offer alternative interpretations of the past have been identified in various socio-cultural initiatives. In the context of Russian memory politics, this approach often becomes oppositional.","PeriodicalId":34286,"journal":{"name":"Studia Rossica Posnaniensia","volume":"47 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Rossica Posnaniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/strp.2024.49.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of interpreting local history is relevant to St. Petersburg, as to many other major historical cities. This article examines phenomena united by the concepts of local (spatial) myth and urban narrative, which go beyond official discourse. Alternative images of the city, based on its concealed places of interest contrast with one of the most widespread representations of St. Petersburg – its association with the heritage of imperial culture. The selection of memorable places and stories shifts from recognizable city landmarks to other objects that reveal the history and image of particular St. Petersburg sites, people’s daily lives and peripheral issues of urban life. This approach to the exploration of urban space, a phenomenon called New Local History, is presented and explained in the article as the rediscovery of the historical potential of the city. The examples given in the article also show the possible role of New Local History in encouraging residents to develop an interest in their own history, in the problems of modernity and in participating in socially significant projects. Trends in interaction with urban space and memory practices that offer alternative interpretations of the past have been identified in various socio-cultural initiatives. In the context of Russian memory politics, this approach often becomes oppositional.
城市非官方历史中的新地方史项目:圣彼得堡案例
解释地方历史的问题与圣彼得堡和其他许多主要历史城市一样,都与圣彼得堡有关。本文探讨了地方(空间)神话和城市叙事这两个概念所包含的现象,它们超越了官方话语的范畴。以隐藏的名胜古迹为基础的另类城市形象与圣彼得堡最普遍的表征之一--与帝国文化传统的联系--形成鲜明对比。令人难忘的地点和故事的选择从可识别的城市地标转向其他物品,这些物品揭示了圣彼得堡特定地点的历史和形象、人们的日常生活以及城市生活的边缘问题。这种探索城市空间的方法被称为 "新地方史"(New Local History),文章将其解释为重新发现城市的历史潜力。文章中列举的例子还显示了新地方史在鼓励居民对自身历史、现代性问题以及参与具有社会意义的项目产生兴趣方面可能发挥的作用。在各种社会文化活动中,人们发现了与城市空间互动的趋势以及对过去进行替代性解释的记忆实践。在俄罗斯记忆政治的背景下,这种方法往往具有反对性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信