Can Artificial Intelligence Engage in the Practice of Law as the Art of Good and Justice?

Neringa Gaubienė
{"title":"Can Artificial Intelligence Engage in the Practice of Law as the Art of Good and Justice?","authors":"Neringa Gaubienė","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores whether artificial intelligence (AI) can engage in the practice of law as an art of good and justice. It examines the historical and philosophical foundations of law as the art of promoting societal harmony and resolving moral dilemmas. The research employs critical and philosophical analysis methods integrating insights from legal scholars, ethicists, technologists, and policymakers. The study identifies AI’s potential to streamline legal processes, enhance access to justice, and reduce bias in decision-making. However, it also highlights ethical challenges such as transparency, accountability, and the impact on the legal workforce. The article emphasises the importance of striking a balance between technological innovation and human values, advocating for proactive regulation and interdisciplinary cooperation to ensure the ethical development and implementation of AI in law. The results of the study highlight the transformative potential of AI in revolutionising legal practice, emphasising its capacity to streamline processes, improve access to justice, and mitigate bias. However, ethical considerations such as transparency, accountability, and the preservation of human judgment are crucial to ensuring that AI integration in law upholds fundamental principles of justice and fairness.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofija. Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2priedas.special-issue.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores whether artificial intelligence (AI) can engage in the practice of law as an art of good and justice. It examines the historical and philosophical foundations of law as the art of promoting societal harmony and resolving moral dilemmas. The research employs critical and philosophical analysis methods integrating insights from legal scholars, ethicists, technologists, and policymakers. The study identifies AI’s potential to streamline legal processes, enhance access to justice, and reduce bias in decision-making. However, it also highlights ethical challenges such as transparency, accountability, and the impact on the legal workforce. The article emphasises the importance of striking a balance between technological innovation and human values, advocating for proactive regulation and interdisciplinary cooperation to ensure the ethical development and implementation of AI in law. The results of the study highlight the transformative potential of AI in revolutionising legal practice, emphasising its capacity to streamline processes, improve access to justice, and mitigate bias. However, ethical considerations such as transparency, accountability, and the preservation of human judgment are crucial to ensuring that AI integration in law upholds fundamental principles of justice and fairness.
人工智能能否参与作为善与正义艺术的法律实践?
本文探讨了人工智能(AI)能否将法律作为一门善与正义的艺术来实践。文章探讨了法律作为促进社会和谐和解决道德困境的艺术的历史和哲学基础。研究采用批判和哲学分析方法,整合了法律学者、伦理学家、技术专家和政策制定者的见解。研究指出了人工智能在简化法律程序、提高司法救助和减少决策偏见方面的潜力。不过,它也强调了道德方面的挑战,如透明度、问责制以及对法律工作者队伍的影响。文章强调了在技术创新和人类价值观之间取得平衡的重要性,倡导积极监管和跨学科合作,以确保人工智能在法律领域的道德发展和实施。研究结果凸显了人工智能在革新法律实践方面的变革潜力,强调了其简化流程、改善司法救助和减少偏见的能力。然而,诸如透明度、问责制和维护人类判断力等伦理方面的考虑因素,对于确保将人工智能融入法律维护公正和公平的基本原则至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信