Differences in effectiveness and tooth sensitivity between modern bleaching techniques: clinical experiences

Maria Cristina Langa, Diana Florina Nica, C. Sinescu
{"title":"Differences in effectiveness and tooth sensitivity between modern bleaching techniques: clinical experiences","authors":"Maria Cristina Langa, Diana Florina Nica, C. Sinescu","doi":"10.1117/12.3021919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dental whitening is a popular method among patients who want to improve the aesthetics of their smile. It is a relatively inexpensive technique and it has a significant impact on the patient’s confidence. Because of the popularity of this procedure, the scope of modern techniques is to minimize both the duration and the eventual adverse effects, such as postoperative sensitivity. A review was performed in order to compare the effectiveness between in-office conventional bleaching treatment and laser activated bleaching. Another aim of the study was to assess the dental sensitivity following these techniques. Three patients were treated using in-office conventional and diode laser-activated bleaching methods. Even though multiple studies have been concluded that the sensitivity levels are not higher using the conventional method in comparison to modern methods, the postoperative sensibility is related to the concentration and the contact time of the bleaching agent. Therefore, we concluded that laser activated bleaching is not significantly more efficient than the conventional method. However, in comparison to the latter method, the former one minimizes the duration of the procedure and decreases the number of sessions, as well as the dose of bleaching agent. Thus, it causes a lower sensitivity to the patient.","PeriodicalId":198425,"journal":{"name":"Other Conferences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Other Conferences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3021919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dental whitening is a popular method among patients who want to improve the aesthetics of their smile. It is a relatively inexpensive technique and it has a significant impact on the patient’s confidence. Because of the popularity of this procedure, the scope of modern techniques is to minimize both the duration and the eventual adverse effects, such as postoperative sensitivity. A review was performed in order to compare the effectiveness between in-office conventional bleaching treatment and laser activated bleaching. Another aim of the study was to assess the dental sensitivity following these techniques. Three patients were treated using in-office conventional and diode laser-activated bleaching methods. Even though multiple studies have been concluded that the sensitivity levels are not higher using the conventional method in comparison to modern methods, the postoperative sensibility is related to the concentration and the contact time of the bleaching agent. Therefore, we concluded that laser activated bleaching is not significantly more efficient than the conventional method. However, in comparison to the latter method, the former one minimizes the duration of the procedure and decreases the number of sessions, as well as the dose of bleaching agent. Thus, it causes a lower sensitivity to the patient.
现代漂白技术在效果和牙齿敏感性方面的差异:临床经验
牙齿美白是一种深受希望改善笑容美观的患者欢迎的方法。它是一种相对便宜的技术,对患者的自信心有很大的影响。由于这种方法很受欢迎,因此现代技术的范围是最大限度地减少持续时间和最终的不良反应,如术后敏感。为了比较诊室传统漂白疗法和激光激活漂白疗法的效果,我们进行了一项回顾性研究。研究的另一个目的是评估采用这些技术后牙齿的敏感度。三名患者分别接受了诊室传统漂白和二极管激光激活漂白治疗。尽管多项研究已经得出结论,与现代方法相比,传统方法的敏感度并不高,但术后敏感度与漂白剂的浓度和接触时间有关。因此,我们得出结论,激光激活漂白的效率并不比传统方法高。不过,与传统方法相比,前者最大限度地缩短了手术时间,减少了治疗次数和漂白剂剂量。因此,它对患者的敏感度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信