{"title":"At The Pivot Point of Cultural Education Management, Teaching, and Artistic Practice","authors":"Sherry Mayo","doi":"10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this paper is to examine the paradigmatic shifts in teaching methodologies, educational, cultural, and artistic practices that occurred during the pandemic and post-pandemic with the aim to provide implications of what will be next for these roles during the recovery phase.\n \nTheoretical Framework: The Higher Education system of distributing instruction was disrupted by the COVID pandemic and both crisis and opportunity resulted from these new modalities of learning. New pedagogical approaches were developed, and this paper looks particularly at art education, art making, and cultural management looking at innovation and issues of digital equity. This pivoting caused a paradigmatic shift in the way participants experienced art, culture, and learning with both pros and cons. (Dodson, J. 2021). What is the role of educational and cultural managers, and artists during this next phase of recovery (Leonard, N. 2020)?\n \nMethod: The primary source of data was empirical observation and exchange with faculty, staff, and students. This is not a research study, but a historical paper based on an educator’s practice. From this perspective, the logic for constructing knowledge is based on research in the literature supporting themes from the field of art education and those proposed by the author.\n \nResults and Discussion: The results revealed in the research were derived by the author from both their empirical observations and experience and their research in the literature. In the discussion section, these results are contextualized considering the theoretical framework, highlighting the implications and relationships identified. Possible limitations of the research include that no one really knows what the future may hold.\n \nResearch Implications: The practical and theoretical implications of this research are discussed, providing insights into how the results can be applied or influence practices in the field of art education. These implications could encompass artistic practice and cultural management as well.\n \nOriginality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by connecting art education, artistic practice, and cultural management and showing their value as well as projecting the future of emerging technologies and what essential roles art practitioners play in this new world. The relevance and value of this research are evidenced by the implications for education, digital literacy, and equity. I also point the way towards workforce development for arts and technology-related jobs. The paper places a priority on high-end digital skills for every citizen.","PeriodicalId":506347,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental","volume":"33 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this paper is to examine the paradigmatic shifts in teaching methodologies, educational, cultural, and artistic practices that occurred during the pandemic and post-pandemic with the aim to provide implications of what will be next for these roles during the recovery phase.
Theoretical Framework: The Higher Education system of distributing instruction was disrupted by the COVID pandemic and both crisis and opportunity resulted from these new modalities of learning. New pedagogical approaches were developed, and this paper looks particularly at art education, art making, and cultural management looking at innovation and issues of digital equity. This pivoting caused a paradigmatic shift in the way participants experienced art, culture, and learning with both pros and cons. (Dodson, J. 2021). What is the role of educational and cultural managers, and artists during this next phase of recovery (Leonard, N. 2020)?
Method: The primary source of data was empirical observation and exchange with faculty, staff, and students. This is not a research study, but a historical paper based on an educator’s practice. From this perspective, the logic for constructing knowledge is based on research in the literature supporting themes from the field of art education and those proposed by the author.
Results and Discussion: The results revealed in the research were derived by the author from both their empirical observations and experience and their research in the literature. In the discussion section, these results are contextualized considering the theoretical framework, highlighting the implications and relationships identified. Possible limitations of the research include that no one really knows what the future may hold.
Research Implications: The practical and theoretical implications of this research are discussed, providing insights into how the results can be applied or influence practices in the field of art education. These implications could encompass artistic practice and cultural management as well.
Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by connecting art education, artistic practice, and cultural management and showing their value as well as projecting the future of emerging technologies and what essential roles art practitioners play in this new world. The relevance and value of this research are evidenced by the implications for education, digital literacy, and equity. I also point the way towards workforce development for arts and technology-related jobs. The paper places a priority on high-end digital skills for every citizen.
目的:本文旨在研究大流行期间和大流行后发生的教学方法、教育、文化和艺术实践方面的范式转变,目的是为这些角色在恢复阶段的下一步工作提供启示。理论框架:COVID 大流行扰乱了高等教育的教学分配系统,这些新的学习模式带来了危机和机遇。新的教学方法应运而生,本文尤其关注艺术教育、艺术创作和文化管理,探讨创新和数字公平问题。这种转折使参与者体验艺术、文化和学习的方式发生了范式转变,有利也有弊。(Dodson, J. 2021)。在下一阶段的恢复过程中,教育和文化管理者以及艺术家的作用是什么(Leonard, N. 2020 年)?方法:数据的主要来源是经验观察以及与教职员工和学生的交流。这不是一项研究,而是一篇基于教育工作者实践的历史性论文。从这个角度来看,构建知识的逻辑是基于支持艺术教育领域主题的文献研究和作者提出的主题。结果与讨论:研究中揭示的结果是作者根据自己的经验观察和体验以及文献研究得出的。在讨论部分,将根据理论框架对这些结果进行背景分析,突出所确定的影响和关系。研究可能存在的局限性包括:没有人真正知道未来会发生什么。研究意义:讨论了本研究的实践和理论意义,深入探讨了如何应用研究成果或影响艺术教育领域的实践。这些影响还可能包括艺术实践和文化管理。原创性/价值:本研究将艺术教育、艺术实践和文化管理联系起来,展示了它们的价值,并预测了新兴技术的未来以及艺术从业者在这个新世界中扮演的重要角色,从而为文献做出了贡献。这项研究的相关性和价值体现在其对教育、数字扫盲和公平的影响上。我还为艺术和技术相关工作的劳动力发展指明了方向。本文将每个公民的高端数字技能放在首位。