Validity of the BOT-2 Short Form for Korean School-Age Children: A Preliminary Study

Children Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.3390/children11060724
Deukgeun Yoon, Dabin Choi, Mi-Su Kim, Seokyeon Ji, Yoo-Sook Joung, Eun Young Kim
{"title":"Validity of the BOT-2 Short Form for Korean School-Age Children: A Preliminary Study","authors":"Deukgeun Yoon, Dabin Choi, Mi-Su Kim, Seokyeon Ji, Yoo-Sook Joung, Eun Young Kim","doi":"10.3390/children11060724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Second Edition (BOT-2) is the most common motor assessment in Korea. The BOT-2–Short Form (SF) is preferred over the complete form (CF) in settings with limited time. The present study aimed to assess the validity of the BOT-2 SF in Korean school-age children. First, we verified that the BOT-2 SF reflects developmental changes in motor skills. Second, we compared the BOT-2 SF scores to those of the BOT-2 CF. A total of 283 Korean school-age children performed the BOT-2. The differences in the BOT-2 SF point according to age group (7 years, 8–9 years, and 10–12 years) were analyzed. A correlation analysis of the standard scores between the BOT-2 SF and CF was conducted. The sensitivity and specificity of the BOT-2 SF were calculated in reference to its CF. Overall, the BOT-2 SF point scores increased with age. The correlation between the total scores of the BOT-2 SF and CF was strong. The BOT-2 SF had a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 92%. This study has demonstrated the validity of the BOT-2 SF in Korean school-age children. The BOT2 SF can be useful in screening Korean school-age children with motor skills problems.","PeriodicalId":9854,"journal":{"name":"Children","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children11060724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Second Edition (BOT-2) is the most common motor assessment in Korea. The BOT-2–Short Form (SF) is preferred over the complete form (CF) in settings with limited time. The present study aimed to assess the validity of the BOT-2 SF in Korean school-age children. First, we verified that the BOT-2 SF reflects developmental changes in motor skills. Second, we compared the BOT-2 SF scores to those of the BOT-2 CF. A total of 283 Korean school-age children performed the BOT-2. The differences in the BOT-2 SF point according to age group (7 years, 8–9 years, and 10–12 years) were analyzed. A correlation analysis of the standard scores between the BOT-2 SF and CF was conducted. The sensitivity and specificity of the BOT-2 SF were calculated in reference to its CF. Overall, the BOT-2 SF point scores increased with age. The correlation between the total scores of the BOT-2 SF and CF was strong. The BOT-2 SF had a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 92%. This study has demonstrated the validity of the BOT-2 SF in Korean school-age children. The BOT2 SF can be useful in screening Korean school-age children with motor skills problems.
韩国学龄儿童 BOT-2 简表的有效性:初步研究
布鲁宁克斯-奥塞瑞斯基运动能力测验第二版(BOT-2)是韩国最常用的运动评估方法。在时间有限的情况下,BOT-2简表(SF)比全表(CF)更受青睐。本研究旨在评估 BOT-2 SF 在韩国学龄儿童中的有效性。首先,我们验证了 BOT-2 SF 反映了运动技能的发展变化。其次,我们将 BOT-2 SF 分数与 BOT-2 CF 分数进行了比较。共有 283 名韩国学龄儿童进行了 BOT-2 测试。我们分析了不同年龄组(7 岁、8-9 岁和 10-12 岁)BOT-2 SF 分数的差异。对 BOT-2 SF 和 CF 的标准分进行了相关分析。参照 CF 计算了 BOT-2 SF 的灵敏度和特异性。总体而言,BOT-2 SF 的点分随着年龄的增长而增加。BOT-2 SF 的总分与 CF 之间的相关性很强。BOT-2 SF 的灵敏度为 83%,特异性为 92%。这项研究证明了 BOT-2 SF 在韩国学龄儿童中的有效性。BOT-2 SF可用于筛查有运动技能问题的韩国学龄儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信