Endovascular Stenting for Superior Vena Cava Syndrome – A Systematic Review

O. Anyagwa, Oluwatoyin Adalia Dairo, R. Tak, Lamia A. Alkodami, Mohammad Azim, Swapnil Ahuja, Kenas Shaji Oommen, Maryam Shakeel, Divine-Blessing Chinwendu Ajah, Shaima Alkodami, Lika Kervalidze, Maha Kassem
{"title":"Endovascular Stenting for Superior Vena Cava Syndrome – A Systematic Review","authors":"O. Anyagwa, Oluwatoyin Adalia Dairo, R. Tak, Lamia A. Alkodami, Mohammad Azim, Swapnil Ahuja, Kenas Shaji Oommen, Maryam Shakeel, Divine-Blessing Chinwendu Ajah, Shaima Alkodami, Lika Kervalidze, Maha Kassem","doi":"10.33590/emj/afus6940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) results from the obstruction or narrowing of the superior vena cava, causing venous congestion and various symptoms such as facial and upper limb swelling, shortness of breath, chest pain, coughing, and, in severe cases, dizziness and headache. The primary treatment for SVCS is balloon angioplasty with endovascular stenting. Post-procedural complications are influenced by factors such as SVCS aetiology, comorbidities, and the presence of arteriovenous fistulas. This review examined eight clinical studies to assess the effectiveness of percutaneous endovascular stenting and associated complications, focusing on improving patient prognosis. The research, conducted through internet search engines and reputable databases, revealed that percutaneous endovascular stenting demonstrated efficacy ranging from 95–100% in addressing SVCS. Common complications post-procedure included SVC narrowing recurrence, airway constriction, and mortality, often linked to malignancy. The findings emphasise the need to refine therapeutic approaches, especially in addressing the root cause of SVCS, which is frequently malignancy. Consequently, implementing additional protocols to reduce the risk of SVCS development is crucial. This comprehensive review provides insights into the effectiveness of endovascular stenting in treating SVCS, highlighting the importance of tailored approaches and ongoing efforts to enhance patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":505023,"journal":{"name":"European Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emj/afus6940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) results from the obstruction or narrowing of the superior vena cava, causing venous congestion and various symptoms such as facial and upper limb swelling, shortness of breath, chest pain, coughing, and, in severe cases, dizziness and headache. The primary treatment for SVCS is balloon angioplasty with endovascular stenting. Post-procedural complications are influenced by factors such as SVCS aetiology, comorbidities, and the presence of arteriovenous fistulas. This review examined eight clinical studies to assess the effectiveness of percutaneous endovascular stenting and associated complications, focusing on improving patient prognosis. The research, conducted through internet search engines and reputable databases, revealed that percutaneous endovascular stenting demonstrated efficacy ranging from 95–100% in addressing SVCS. Common complications post-procedure included SVC narrowing recurrence, airway constriction, and mortality, often linked to malignancy. The findings emphasise the need to refine therapeutic approaches, especially in addressing the root cause of SVCS, which is frequently malignancy. Consequently, implementing additional protocols to reduce the risk of SVCS development is crucial. This comprehensive review provides insights into the effectiveness of endovascular stenting in treating SVCS, highlighting the importance of tailored approaches and ongoing efforts to enhance patient outcomes.
上腔静脉综合征的血管内支架植入术 - 系统综述
上腔静脉综合征(SVCS)是由上腔静脉阻塞或狭窄引起的,会导致静脉充血和各种症状,如面部和上肢肿胀、气短、胸痛、咳嗽,严重时还会出现头晕和头痛。SVCS 的主要治疗方法是球囊血管成形术加血管内支架植入术。手术后并发症受 SVCS 病因、合并症和是否存在动静脉瘘等因素的影响。本综述考察了八项临床研究,以评估经皮血管内支架置入术的有效性和相关并发症,重点是改善患者的预后。通过互联网搜索引擎和知名数据库进行的研究显示,经皮血管内支架置入术在治疗 SVCS 方面的有效率为 95%-100%。术后常见并发症包括SVC狭窄复发、气道狭窄和死亡率,通常与恶性肿瘤有关。研究结果强调了完善治疗方法的必要性,尤其是在解决 SVCS 的根本原因(通常是恶性肿瘤)方面。因此,实施更多方案以降低 SVCS 发生的风险至关重要。本综述深入探讨了血管内支架置入术治疗 SVCS 的有效性,强调了量身定制的方法和不断努力提高患者预后的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信