The impact of institutional logics on specifications quality: investigating the mediation effects of legitimacy and stewardship behaviour

Nabiira Nantongo, Matthew Kalubanga, Joseph Ntayi, Bonny Bagenda, Beatrice Nyakeishiki
{"title":"The impact of institutional logics on specifications quality: investigating the mediation effects of legitimacy and stewardship behaviour","authors":"Nabiira Nantongo, Matthew Kalubanga, Joseph Ntayi, Bonny Bagenda, Beatrice Nyakeishiki","doi":"10.1108/ijqrm-10-2023-0302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to examine the relationship between institutional logics and specifications quality, and how this relationship is mediated by the legitimacy of the procurement process and stewardship behaviour.Design/methodology/approachThis study draws on insights from institutional logics theory, and legitimacy and stewardship behaviour literature. We conducted an extended literature review to gain a comprehensive understanding of “institutional logics” and their manifestations in organizational contexts, utilizing the 2000–2024 data collected from the EBSCO, Scopus and Web of Science databases, complemented with Google Scholar. We gather that institutional logics manifest in several forms, and that while some organizations may thrive on a single logic, in certain contexts institutional logics can manifest in combinations – “multiple logics or hybrids”. Based on this understanding, we developed testable research hypotheses, predicting the influences of institutional logics – professional logic, efficient service logic and delivery (market) logic, on legitimacy, stewardship behaviour and specifications quality. We then carried out an empirical study, adopting a quantitative cross-sectional survey design with a self-administered questionnaire to test the hypothesized relationships. The empirical data were obtained from 162 procuring and disposing entities in Uganda and analyzed using the partial least squares structural equation modelling technique.FindingsThe study findings reveal that institutional logics exert a strong positive effect on the legitimacy of the procurement process and on stewardship behaviour, which, in turn, both positively influence specifications quality.Research limitations/implicationsThe study findings have implications for theory and practice. The study findings provide useful insights that support the conceptual and theoretical development of institutional logics theory and applications in procurement literature. In addition, the study findings enhance procurement managers’ understanding of the mechanisms through which institutional logics can foster specifications quality. However, considering the fact that the study was conducted in a single country context, and focused on the public sector only, the findings of the study might not be generalizable globally.Originality/valueThis study contributes to established knowledge about quality management and procurement by examining the legitimacy of the procurement process and stewardship behaviour of those involved in procurement processes as mechanisms through which procuring entities are able to use institutional logics to enhance specifications quality. In addition, the study highlights areas for future research that may be explored to increase understanding of the value of institutional logics in ensuring specifications quality, and the link between specifications quality and the general performance of procuring entities.","PeriodicalId":506639,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqrm-10-2023-0302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to examine the relationship between institutional logics and specifications quality, and how this relationship is mediated by the legitimacy of the procurement process and stewardship behaviour.Design/methodology/approachThis study draws on insights from institutional logics theory, and legitimacy and stewardship behaviour literature. We conducted an extended literature review to gain a comprehensive understanding of “institutional logics” and their manifestations in organizational contexts, utilizing the 2000–2024 data collected from the EBSCO, Scopus and Web of Science databases, complemented with Google Scholar. We gather that institutional logics manifest in several forms, and that while some organizations may thrive on a single logic, in certain contexts institutional logics can manifest in combinations – “multiple logics or hybrids”. Based on this understanding, we developed testable research hypotheses, predicting the influences of institutional logics – professional logic, efficient service logic and delivery (market) logic, on legitimacy, stewardship behaviour and specifications quality. We then carried out an empirical study, adopting a quantitative cross-sectional survey design with a self-administered questionnaire to test the hypothesized relationships. The empirical data were obtained from 162 procuring and disposing entities in Uganda and analyzed using the partial least squares structural equation modelling technique.FindingsThe study findings reveal that institutional logics exert a strong positive effect on the legitimacy of the procurement process and on stewardship behaviour, which, in turn, both positively influence specifications quality.Research limitations/implicationsThe study findings have implications for theory and practice. The study findings provide useful insights that support the conceptual and theoretical development of institutional logics theory and applications in procurement literature. In addition, the study findings enhance procurement managers’ understanding of the mechanisms through which institutional logics can foster specifications quality. However, considering the fact that the study was conducted in a single country context, and focused on the public sector only, the findings of the study might not be generalizable globally.Originality/valueThis study contributes to established knowledge about quality management and procurement by examining the legitimacy of the procurement process and stewardship behaviour of those involved in procurement processes as mechanisms through which procuring entities are able to use institutional logics to enhance specifications quality. In addition, the study highlights areas for future research that may be explored to increase understanding of the value of institutional logics in ensuring specifications quality, and the link between specifications quality and the general performance of procuring entities.
制度逻辑对规范质量的影响:研究合法性和管理行为的中介效应
目的 本研究旨在探讨制度逻辑与规格质量之间的关系,以及这种关系如何通过采购过程的合法性和管理行为来调节。我们利用从 EBSCO、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库收集到的 2000-2024 年数据,并辅以谷歌学术(Google Scholar),对文献进行了扩展回顾,以全面了解 "制度逻辑 "及其在组织环境中的表现形式。我们发现,制度逻辑有多种表现形式,虽然有些组织可能在单一逻辑的基础上发展壮大,但在某些情况下,制度逻辑可能以组合的形式表现出来,即 "多重逻辑或混合逻辑"。基于这一认识,我们提出了可检验的研究假设,预测机构逻辑--专业逻辑、高效服务逻辑和交付(市场)逻辑--对合法性、管理行为和规格质量的影响。然后,我们开展了一项实证研究,采用自填问卷的横截面定量调查设计来检验假设的关系。实证数据来自乌干达的 162 个采购和处置实体,并使用偏最小二乘法结构方程建模技术进行了分析。研究结果研究结果表明,制度逻辑对采购过程的合法性和管理行为产生了强烈的积极影响,而这反过来又对规格质量产生了积极影响。研究结果为制度逻辑理论的概念和理论发展以及在采购文献中的应用提供了有益的启示。此外,研究结果加深了采购管理人员对制度逻辑促进规格质量的机制的理解。不过,考虑到本研究是在单一国家背景下进行的,并且只侧重于公共部门,因此研究结果可能无法在全球范围内推广。 本研究通过研究采购过程的合法性和采购过程中相关人员的管理行为,将其作为采购实体能够利用制度逻辑提高规格质量的机制,从而为有关质量管理和采购的既有知识做出贡献。此外,本研究还强调了今后研究可探索的领域,以加深对机构逻辑在确保规格质量方面的价值以及规格质量与采购实体总体绩效之间联系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信