Oral Appliance Therapy and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation as Non-PAP Treatment Alternatives for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Narrative Expert Review

Sairam Parthasarathy, Najib T Ayas, Richard Bogan, Dennis Hwang, Clete Kushida, Jonathan S Lown, Joseph M Ojile, Imran Patel, Bharati Prasad, David M Rapoport, Patrick Strollo, Oliver M Vanderveken, John Viviano
{"title":"Oral Appliance Therapy and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation as Non-PAP Treatment Alternatives for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Narrative Expert Review","authors":"Sairam Parthasarathy, Najib T Ayas, Richard Bogan, Dennis Hwang, Clete Kushida, Jonathan S Lown, Joseph M Ojile, Imran Patel, Bharati Prasad, David M Rapoport, Patrick Strollo, Oliver M Vanderveken, John Viviano","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This perspective on alternatives to Positive Airway Pressure therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea summarizes the proceedings of a focus group that was conducted by the Sleep Research Society Foundation. This perspective is from a multi-disciplinary panel of experts from sleep medicine, dental sleep medicine, and otolaryngology that aims to identify the current role of Oral Appliance Therapy and hypoglossal nerve stimulation for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with emphasis on the U.S. practice arena. A secondary aim is to identify – from an implementation science standpoint -- the various barriers and facilitators for adoption of non-PAP treatment that includes access to care, multi-disciplinary expertise, reimbursement, regulatory aspects, current treatment guidelines, health policies and other factors related to delivery of care. The panel has contextualized the review with recent events – such as a large-scale PAP device recall compounded by supply chain woes of the pandemic -- and emerging science in the field of obstructive sleep apnea and offers solutions for multi-disciplinary approaches while identifying knowledge gaps and future research opportunities.","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This perspective on alternatives to Positive Airway Pressure therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea summarizes the proceedings of a focus group that was conducted by the Sleep Research Society Foundation. This perspective is from a multi-disciplinary panel of experts from sleep medicine, dental sleep medicine, and otolaryngology that aims to identify the current role of Oral Appliance Therapy and hypoglossal nerve stimulation for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with emphasis on the U.S. practice arena. A secondary aim is to identify – from an implementation science standpoint -- the various barriers and facilitators for adoption of non-PAP treatment that includes access to care, multi-disciplinary expertise, reimbursement, regulatory aspects, current treatment guidelines, health policies and other factors related to delivery of care. The panel has contextualized the review with recent events – such as a large-scale PAP device recall compounded by supply chain woes of the pandemic -- and emerging science in the field of obstructive sleep apnea and offers solutions for multi-disciplinary approaches while identifying knowledge gaps and future research opportunities.
口腔矫治器疗法和舌下神经刺激作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的非 PAP 替代治疗方法:专家综述
这篇关于治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的气道正压疗法替代方案的观点总结了睡眠研究学会基金会开展的焦点小组会议的讨论情况。该小组由来自睡眠医学、牙科睡眠医学和耳鼻喉科的多学科专家组成,旨在确定口腔矫治器疗法和舌下神经刺激法在治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停方面的当前作用,重点关注美国的实践领域。另一个目的是从实施科学的角度确定采用非 PAP 治疗的各种障碍和促进因素,包括获得护理、多学科专业知识、报销、监管方面、现行治疗指南、卫生政策以及与提供护理相关的其他因素。专家小组结合近期发生的事件--如大规模呼吸机设备召回,以及大流行病造成的供应链困境--和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停领域的新兴科学,对审查内容进行了梳理,并在确定知识差距和未来研究机会的同时,提出了多学科方法的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信