The ‘Mystery’ of Lop Nor: Empire, Geographical ‘Problems’ and Climate Change on the Silk Roads

IF 0.8 3区 历史学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Lachlan Fleetwood
{"title":"The ‘Mystery’ of Lop Nor: Empire, Geographical ‘Problems’ and Climate Change on the Silk Roads","authors":"Lachlan Fleetwood","doi":"10.3828/whp.eh.63830915903600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the late nineteenth century, rumours of a large lake in Central Asia provided the material for a vexing ‘problem’ in imperial geography. That Lop Nor existed – or at least once had – was indicated by information in Chinese chronicles. However, identifying the lake proved challenging, not least because it did not always appear to have been located in the same place. Attracting romanticised epithets like ‘mysterious’ and ‘wandering’, Lop Nor became an important site for imperial scientific speculations about climatic stability and change. This article considers investigations by Russian, British, Swedish and American geographers (as well as the key roles of Loplyk brokers such as Ördek, who located the ancient city of Loulan that had once graced the shores of the lake and been abandoned in the face of changing habitability). In turn, the article examines the way Lop Nor was bound up in the formation of imperial imaginaries of the ‘Silk Roads’, as well as incorporated by geographers like Peter Kropotkin and Ellsworth Huntington into theories of desiccation and climate change within recent human history. More widely, considering debates over Lop Nor allows for an examination of the role of imperial geographical ‘problems’ in the history of climate sciences and the development of geography as a discipline.","PeriodicalId":45574,"journal":{"name":"Environment and History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/whp.eh.63830915903600","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the late nineteenth century, rumours of a large lake in Central Asia provided the material for a vexing ‘problem’ in imperial geography. That Lop Nor existed – or at least once had – was indicated by information in Chinese chronicles. However, identifying the lake proved challenging, not least because it did not always appear to have been located in the same place. Attracting romanticised epithets like ‘mysterious’ and ‘wandering’, Lop Nor became an important site for imperial scientific speculations about climatic stability and change. This article considers investigations by Russian, British, Swedish and American geographers (as well as the key roles of Loplyk brokers such as Ördek, who located the ancient city of Loulan that had once graced the shores of the lake and been abandoned in the face of changing habitability). In turn, the article examines the way Lop Nor was bound up in the formation of imperial imaginaries of the ‘Silk Roads’, as well as incorporated by geographers like Peter Kropotkin and Ellsworth Huntington into theories of desiccation and climate change within recent human history. More widely, considering debates over Lop Nor allows for an examination of the role of imperial geographical ‘problems’ in the history of climate sciences and the development of geography as a discipline.
罗布泊之谜:丝绸之路上的帝国、地理 "问题 "和气候变化
19 世纪末,关于中亚有一个大湖的传言为帝国地理学中一个棘手的 "问题 "提供了素材。中国编年史中的信息表明,罗布泊是存在的,或者至少曾经存在过。然而,要确定罗布泊湖的位置却极具挑战性,尤其是因为罗布泊湖似乎并不总是位于同一个地方。罗布泊被冠以 "神秘 "和 "漂泊 "等浪漫的称谓,成为帝国科学界推测气候稳定性和变化的重要地点。本文探讨了俄罗斯、英国、瑞典和美国地理学家的研究成果(以及罗布泊掮客厄尔德克等人的重要作用,厄尔德克找到了楼兰古城的位置,楼兰古城曾是湖畔的一道亮丽风景线,后因可居住性的改变而被遗弃)。文章进而探讨了罗布泊是如何与 "丝绸之路 "的帝国想象结合在一起的,以及彼得-克鲁泡特金(Peter Kropotkin)和埃尔斯沃思-亨廷顿(Ellsworth Huntington)等地理学家是如何将罗布泊纳入人类近代史中的干燥和气候变化理论的。从更广泛的角度看,考虑有关诺罗普的争论有助于研究帝国地理 "问题 "在气候科学史上的作用以及地理学作为一门学科的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Environment and History is an interdisciplinary journal which aims to bring scholars in the humanities and biological sciences closer together, with the deliberate intention of constructing long and well-founded perspectives on present day environmental problems. Articles appearing in Environment and History are abstracted and indexed in America: History and Life, British Humanities Index, CAB Abstracts, Environment Abstracts, Environmental Policy Abstracts, Forestry Abstracts, Geo Abstracts, Historical Abstracts, History Journals Guide, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, Landscape Research Extra, Referativnyi Zhurnal, Rural Sociology Abstracts, Social Sciences in Forestry and World Agricultural Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信