Developing a novel inclusive policy analysis framework based on capability approach and institutional analysis and development method

Arindam Biswas
{"title":"Developing a novel inclusive policy analysis framework based on capability approach and institutional analysis and development method","authors":"Arindam Biswas","doi":"10.1111/spol.13051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops a novel framework to measure inclusive policy based on capability approach and institutional analysis and development method. In the process, it records its distinction of inclusive growth from earlier growth theories, particularly highlighting its economic and non‐economic dimensions. The paper inculcates consequential ethics in discussing inclusive growth. The proposed framework is conceptualised on the theoretical foundation of Amartya Sen's capability approach and Elinor Ostrom's IAD method. The framework allows theorists to develop more precise theories and models and derive empirical analysis of existing and proposed policies. The paper identifies the major limitations of the existing inclusive policy analysis methods which include disregarding the ‘noneconomic dimensions of inclusive growth’ (benefit share, participation, equality of opportunity). The existing methods endorses equality of opportunity from an arbitrary point to wrongly fulfil the inclusiveness dimension. Such an approach fails in sustaining moral and ethical rightness of equity. Further, the excising methodologies do not disclose the precise time of change in opportunities among the target population resulting into waste of policy resources. The proposed framework's novel contribution is integrating CA and IAD method to reveal the precise time of change in opportunity that occurs over time due to policy implementation. The framework will help policy makers to measure policy outcome and reduce waste of resource. Analysts and researchers can apply framework for empirical analysis to identify the inclusive growth policy or compare inclusive policy between various countries, states, and regions.","PeriodicalId":271904,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy & Administration","volume":"5 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper develops a novel framework to measure inclusive policy based on capability approach and institutional analysis and development method. In the process, it records its distinction of inclusive growth from earlier growth theories, particularly highlighting its economic and non‐economic dimensions. The paper inculcates consequential ethics in discussing inclusive growth. The proposed framework is conceptualised on the theoretical foundation of Amartya Sen's capability approach and Elinor Ostrom's IAD method. The framework allows theorists to develop more precise theories and models and derive empirical analysis of existing and proposed policies. The paper identifies the major limitations of the existing inclusive policy analysis methods which include disregarding the ‘noneconomic dimensions of inclusive growth’ (benefit share, participation, equality of opportunity). The existing methods endorses equality of opportunity from an arbitrary point to wrongly fulfil the inclusiveness dimension. Such an approach fails in sustaining moral and ethical rightness of equity. Further, the excising methodologies do not disclose the precise time of change in opportunities among the target population resulting into waste of policy resources. The proposed framework's novel contribution is integrating CA and IAD method to reveal the precise time of change in opportunity that occurs over time due to policy implementation. The framework will help policy makers to measure policy outcome and reduce waste of resource. Analysts and researchers can apply framework for empirical analysis to identify the inclusive growth policy or compare inclusive policy between various countries, states, and regions.
基于能力方法和机构分析与发展方法,开发新型包容性政策分析框架
本文以能力方法和机构分析与发展方法为基础,建立了衡量包容性政策的新框架。在此过程中,它记录了包容性增长与早期增长理论的区别,特别强调了其经济和非经济层面。本文在讨论包容性增长时灌输了相应的伦理观。所提议的框架是在阿马蒂亚-森的能力方法和埃莉诺-奥斯特罗姆的 IAD 方法的理论基础上构思的。该框架使理论家们能够建立更精确的理论和模型,并对现有政策和拟议政策进行实证分析。本文指出了现有包容性政策分析方法的主要局限性,其中包括忽视 "包容性增长的非经济层面"(利益共享、参与、机会平等)。现有方法武断地认可机会均等,从而错误地实现了包容性维度。这种方法无法维持公平在道德和伦理上的正确性。此外,切除法无法准确揭示目标人群机会变化的时间,造成政策资源的浪费。拟议框架的新贡献在于整合了 CA 和 IAD 方法,以揭示因政策实施而随时间推移发生的机会变化的精确时间。该框架将帮助决策者衡量政策成果,减少资源浪费。分析师和研究人员可应用该框架进行实证分析,以确定包容性增长政策或比较不同国家、州和地区之间的包容性政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信