Apology strategies in Tashelhit: linguistic realization and religious influence

Q2 Arts and Humanities
M’hand Aatar, Hassan Skouri, Lalla Asmae Karama
{"title":"Apology strategies in Tashelhit: linguistic realization and religious influence","authors":"M’hand Aatar, Hassan Skouri, Lalla Asmae Karama","doi":"10.1515/lpp-2024-2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study adopts the Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP) framework to investigate the apology strategies used by L1 speakers of Tashelhit, a variety of Amazigh spoken in central Morocco. To this end, 82 university students either filled an assessment questionnaire or participated in an oral closed role-play. The findings indicated that L1 speakers of Tashelhit employed seven strategies to apologize, namely taking on responsibility, Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices (IFIDs), explanation or account, offer of repair, promise of forbearance, determinism, and self-criticism. While taking on responsibility, IFIDs, and explanation or account were used most frequently in all the role-play situations to realize apologies, the other apology strategies appeared to be situation-dependent. There was also a tendency for L1 speakers of Tashelhit to use certain religious expressions to modify their apologies. These findings yielded a number of recommendations for further research and suggestions for improving the teaching of apologies in Tashelhit.","PeriodicalId":39423,"journal":{"name":"Lodz Papers in Pragmatics","volume":"12 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lodz Papers in Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2024-2005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study adopts the Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP) framework to investigate the apology strategies used by L1 speakers of Tashelhit, a variety of Amazigh spoken in central Morocco. To this end, 82 university students either filled an assessment questionnaire or participated in an oral closed role-play. The findings indicated that L1 speakers of Tashelhit employed seven strategies to apologize, namely taking on responsibility, Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices (IFIDs), explanation or account, offer of repair, promise of forbearance, determinism, and self-criticism. While taking on responsibility, IFIDs, and explanation or account were used most frequently in all the role-play situations to realize apologies, the other apology strategies appeared to be situation-dependent. There was also a tendency for L1 speakers of Tashelhit to use certain religious expressions to modify their apologies. These findings yielded a number of recommendations for further research and suggestions for improving the teaching of apologies in Tashelhit.
塔谢赫特的道歉策略:语言实现和宗教影响
内容提要 本研究采用跨文化言语行为实现模式(CCSARP)框架,调查以摩洛哥中部阿马齐格语(Tashelhit)为第一语言的人所使用的道歉策略。为此,82 名大学生填写了评估问卷或参加了口头封闭式角色扮演。研究结果表明,以塔谢赫特语为母语的人在道歉时使用了七种策略,即承担责任、说明力指示装置(IFIDs)、解释或说明、主动修复、承诺宽容、确定性和自我批评。在所有的角色扮演情境中,承担责任、IFIDs 和解释或说明是最常用的道歉策略,而其他道歉策略似乎取决于情境。此外,塔谢赫特语第一语言使用者还倾向于使用某些宗教表达方式来修饰他们的道歉。这些发现为进一步研究提出了一些建议,并为改进塔谢赫特语道歉教学提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信