Doing relationship while doing social work

Kathrin Aghamiri, Rebekka Streck, Ursula Unterkofler
{"title":"Doing relationship while doing social work","authors":"Kathrin Aghamiri, Rebekka Streck, Ursula Unterkofler","doi":"10.1332/27551768y2024d000000015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What constitutes social work is a central question in theory building. If social work wants to be more than a model idea, we cannot answer this question without looking at social work practice. The article presents ‘doing social work’ as an approach to theorising social work through ethnographic research. In addition to the basic theoretical and methodological characteristics of the approach, we present four modes of doing social work, which have been developed based on a comparison of different ethnographic studies in different fields: deciding in uncertainty; playing with ambiguity; using categories of difference; and disciplining the everyday. In the following, the mode of playing with ambiguity will be singled out and presented in detail, as it has an important impact on doing relationship while doing social work. In the article, we will use ethnographic data and examples to show how actors actively deal with different roles without making this explicit.","PeriodicalId":504603,"journal":{"name":"European Social Work Research","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Social Work Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/27551768y2024d000000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What constitutes social work is a central question in theory building. If social work wants to be more than a model idea, we cannot answer this question without looking at social work practice. The article presents ‘doing social work’ as an approach to theorising social work through ethnographic research. In addition to the basic theoretical and methodological characteristics of the approach, we present four modes of doing social work, which have been developed based on a comparison of different ethnographic studies in different fields: deciding in uncertainty; playing with ambiguity; using categories of difference; and disciplining the everyday. In the following, the mode of playing with ambiguity will be singled out and presented in detail, as it has an important impact on doing relationship while doing social work. In the article, we will use ethnographic data and examples to show how actors actively deal with different roles without making this explicit.
在从事社会工作的同时处理人际关系
什么是社会工作是理论建设的核心问题。如果社会工作不仅仅是一个模式化的概念,我们就不能不研究社会工作实践来回答这个问题。本文介绍了 "做社会工作 "这一通过人种学研究将社会工作理论化的方法。除了该方法的基本理论和方法论特征之外,我们还介绍了 "做社会工作 "的四种模式,这四种模式是在对不同领域的人种学研究进行比较的基础上形成的:在不确定性中做出决定;玩弄模糊性;使用差异类别;以及规范日常工作。在下文中,我们将挑出 "玩弄模糊性 "这一模式,并对其进行详细介绍,因为它对在开展社会工作的同时处理好关系有着重要影响。在文章中,我们将利用人种学数据和实例来说明行动者是如何在没有明确说明的情况下积极处理不同角色的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信