Deep learning based diagnosis of PTSD using 3D-CNN and resting-state fMRI data

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mirza Naveed Shahzad, Haider Ali
{"title":"Deep learning based diagnosis of PTSD using 3D-CNN and resting-state fMRI data","authors":"Mirza Naveed Shahzad,&nbsp;Haider Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.pscychresns.2024.111845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The incidence rate of Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is currently increasing due to wars, terrorism, and pandemic disease situations. Therefore, accurate detection of PTSD is crucial for the treatment of the patients, for this purpose, the present study aims to classify individuals with PTSD versus healthy control.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) scans of 19 PTSD and 24 healthy control male subjects have been used to identify the activation pattern in most affected brain regions using group-level independent component analysis (ICA) and <em>t</em>-test. To classify PTSD-affected subjects from healthy control six machine learning techniques including random forest, Naive Bayes, support vector machine, decision tree, K-nearest neighbor, linear discriminant analysis, and deep learning three-dimensional 3D-CNN have been performed on the data and compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The rs-fMRI scans of the most commonly investigated 11 regions of trauma-exposed and healthy brains are analyzed to observe their level of activation. Amygdala and insula regions are determined as the most activated regions from the regions-of-interest in the brain of PTSD subjects. In addition, machine learning techniques have been applied to the components extracted from ICA but the models provided low classification accuracy. The ICA components are also fed into the 3D-CNN model, which is trained with a 5-fold cross-validation method. The 3D-CNN model demonstrated high accuracies, such as 98.12%, 98.25 %, and 98.00 % on average with training, validation, and testing datasets, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings indicate that 3D-CNN is a surpassing method than the other six considered techniques and it helps to recognize PTSD patients accurately.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20776,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925492724000684","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The incidence rate of Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is currently increasing due to wars, terrorism, and pandemic disease situations. Therefore, accurate detection of PTSD is crucial for the treatment of the patients, for this purpose, the present study aims to classify individuals with PTSD versus healthy control.

Methods

The resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) scans of 19 PTSD and 24 healthy control male subjects have been used to identify the activation pattern in most affected brain regions using group-level independent component analysis (ICA) and t-test. To classify PTSD-affected subjects from healthy control six machine learning techniques including random forest, Naive Bayes, support vector machine, decision tree, K-nearest neighbor, linear discriminant analysis, and deep learning three-dimensional 3D-CNN have been performed on the data and compared.

Results

The rs-fMRI scans of the most commonly investigated 11 regions of trauma-exposed and healthy brains are analyzed to observe their level of activation. Amygdala and insula regions are determined as the most activated regions from the regions-of-interest in the brain of PTSD subjects. In addition, machine learning techniques have been applied to the components extracted from ICA but the models provided low classification accuracy. The ICA components are also fed into the 3D-CNN model, which is trained with a 5-fold cross-validation method. The 3D-CNN model demonstrated high accuracies, such as 98.12%, 98.25 %, and 98.00 % on average with training, validation, and testing datasets, respectively.

Conclusion

The findings indicate that 3D-CNN is a surpassing method than the other six considered techniques and it helps to recognize PTSD patients accurately.

利用 3D-CNN 和静息态 fMRI 数据进行基于深度学习的创伤后应激障碍诊断
背景目前,由于战争、恐怖主义和大流行病等原因,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的发病率正在上升。因此,准确检测创伤后应激障碍对患者的治疗至关重要,为此,本研究旨在将创伤后应激障碍患者与健康对照组的患者进行分类。方法采用19名创伤后应激障碍男性受试者和24名健康对照组男性受试者的静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)扫描结果,利用组级独立成分分析(ICA)和t检验来识别受影响最大的大脑区域的激活模式。为了将受创伤后应激障碍影响的受试者与健康对照组进行分类,对数据进行了六种机器学习技术的比较,包括随机森林、奈夫贝叶斯、支持向量机、决策树、K-近邻、线性判别分析和深度学习三维网络。在创伤后应激障碍受试者的大脑感兴趣区中,杏仁核和岛叶被确定为激活程度最高的区域。此外,还对从 ICA 提取的成分应用了机器学习技术,但这些模型的分类准确率较低。ICA 成分也被输入 3D-CNN 模型,该模型采用 5 倍交叉验证法进行训练。3D-CNN 模型的准确率很高,在训练、验证和测试数据集上的平均准确率分别为 98.12%、98.25% 和 98.00%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Neuroimaging section of Psychiatry Research publishes manuscripts on positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized electroencephalographic topography, regional cerebral blood flow, computed tomography, magnetoencephalography, autoradiography, post-mortem regional analyses, and other imaging techniques. Reports concerning results in psychiatric disorders, dementias, and the effects of behaviorial tasks and pharmacological treatments are featured. We also invite manuscripts on the methods of obtaining images and computer processing of the images themselves. Selected case reports are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信