Early Postoperative Rapid Rehabilitation Yields More Favorable Short-term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Patellar Realignment Surgery for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1177/03635465241254524
Jiayao Zhang, Sike Lai, Junqiao Li, Chenghao Zhang, Lei Yao, Yuyan Zhang, Kunhao Chen, Wufeng Cai, Jian Li, Qi Li
{"title":"Early Postoperative Rapid Rehabilitation Yields More Favorable Short-term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Patellar Realignment Surgery for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Jiayao Zhang, Sike Lai, Junqiao Li, Chenghao Zhang, Lei Yao, Yuyan Zhang, Kunhao Chen, Wufeng Cai, Jian Li, Qi Li","doi":"10.1177/03635465241254524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of a rapid rehabilitation protocol for postoperative recovery after recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) has gradually gained attention; nonetheless, evidence of its safety and effectiveness is lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of early rapid rehabilitation with those of conservative rehabilitation in patients with RPD.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 patients with RPD who underwent tibial tubercle osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction were enrolled between January 2018 and February 2019. Postoperatively, the patients were randomly assigned to either the early rapid group (rapid group; n = 25 patients) or the conservative group (control group; n = 25 patients) for rehabilitation training. The rapid group underwent faster progression in weightbearing and range of motion (ROM) training. Knee joint functional scores, ROM, bilateral thigh circumference differences, and imaging data were recorded preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively for comparison. Postoperative complications were recorded over the 24-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline data did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Postoperatively, compared with the control group, the rapid group had higher Tegner scores at 6 weeks and 3 months; higher Lysholm scores at 3 and 6 months; higher International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months; better ROM; and smaller bilateral thigh circumference differences at 24 months (<i>P</i> < .05 for all). However, no differences were observed in the Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 24 months postoperatively. At the 6-week and subsequent follow-up visits, the Caton and Insall indices were lower in the control group than in the rapid group (<i>P</i> < .01 for all). Moreover, compared with the control group, the rapid group had a lower incidence of patella baja at 24 months (0% vs 17%) and fewer complications during the whole follow-up period (<i>P</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early rapid postoperative rehabilitation appears to be safe and effective for patients who undergo tibial tubercle osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to treat RPD. In the short term, this approach was shown to be more advantageous than conservative rehabilitation in improving functional scores, allowing an earlier return to daily activities, although the lack of difference at 24 months implies no long-term benefits. In addition, it potentially helped to prevent the occurrence of complications, including patella baja.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ChiCTR1800014648 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241254524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Use of a rapid rehabilitation protocol for postoperative recovery after recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) has gradually gained attention; nonetheless, evidence of its safety and effectiveness is lacking.

Purpose: To compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of early rapid rehabilitation with those of conservative rehabilitation in patients with RPD.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: A total of 50 patients with RPD who underwent tibial tubercle osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction were enrolled between January 2018 and February 2019. Postoperatively, the patients were randomly assigned to either the early rapid group (rapid group; n = 25 patients) or the conservative group (control group; n = 25 patients) for rehabilitation training. The rapid group underwent faster progression in weightbearing and range of motion (ROM) training. Knee joint functional scores, ROM, bilateral thigh circumference differences, and imaging data were recorded preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively for comparison. Postoperative complications were recorded over the 24-month follow-up period.

Results: The baseline data did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Postoperatively, compared with the control group, the rapid group had higher Tegner scores at 6 weeks and 3 months; higher Lysholm scores at 3 and 6 months; higher International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months; better ROM; and smaller bilateral thigh circumference differences at 24 months (P < .05 for all). However, no differences were observed in the Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 24 months postoperatively. At the 6-week and subsequent follow-up visits, the Caton and Insall indices were lower in the control group than in the rapid group (P < .01 for all). Moreover, compared with the control group, the rapid group had a lower incidence of patella baja at 24 months (0% vs 17%) and fewer complications during the whole follow-up period (P < .01).

Conclusion: Early rapid postoperative rehabilitation appears to be safe and effective for patients who undergo tibial tubercle osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to treat RPD. In the short term, this approach was shown to be more advantageous than conservative rehabilitation in improving functional scores, allowing an earlier return to daily activities, although the lack of difference at 24 months implies no long-term benefits. In addition, it potentially helped to prevent the occurrence of complications, including patella baja.

Registration: ChiCTR1800014648 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

接受髌骨复位手术治疗复发性髌骨脱位的患者术后早期快速康复可获得更有利的短期疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
背景:目的:比较复发性髌骨脱位(RPD)患者术后早期快速康复与保守康复的短期疗效:研究设计:随机对照试验;证据等级,2:2018年1月至2019年2月期间,共纳入50名接受胫骨结节截骨术联合髌骨内侧韧带重建术的RPD患者。术后,患者被随机分配到早期快速组(快速组;n = 25 名患者)或保守组(对照组;n = 25 名患者)进行康复训练。快速组在负重和活动范围(ROM)训练方面进展更快。术前、术后6周、术后3、6、12和24个月时记录膝关节功能评分、ROM、双侧大腿围差异和影像学数据,以进行比较。在24个月的随访期间记录了术后并发症:结果:两组患者的基线数据无明显差异。术后,与对照组相比,快速组在6周和3个月时的Tegner评分更高;在3个月和6个月时的Lysholm评分更高;在6周、3个月和12个月时的国际膝关节文献委员会评分更高;ROM更好;在24个月时的双侧大腿周长差异更小(P均<0.05)。不过,术后24个月时,Tegner、Lysholm和国际膝关节文献委员会的评分均无差异。在 6 周和随后的随访中,对照组的 Caton 指数和 Insall 指数均低于快速组(P < .01)。此外,与对照组相比,快速组在术后24个月时髌骨折的发生率较低(0% vs 17%),在整个随访期间并发症较少(P < .01):结论:对于接受胫骨结节截骨术联合髌骨内侧韧带重建术治疗RPD的患者来说,术后早期快速康复似乎是安全有效的。从短期来看,这种方法在改善功能评分方面比保守康复更有优势,可以让患者更早地恢复日常活动,尽管在24个月时没有差异,这意味着没有长期益处。此外,这种方法还有助于预防并发症的发生,包括髌骨骨折:注册:ChiCTR1800014648(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信