Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2024-06-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S461630
Yitao Zheng, Yanjun Xiang, Hongqi Shi, Zhuoqun Lin, Shuqun Cheng, Jiuting Zhu
{"title":"Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.","authors":"Yitao Zheng, Yanjun Xiang, Hongqi Shi, Zhuoqun Lin, Shuqun Cheng, Jiuting Zhu","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S461630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with systemic therapy has shown significant efficacy for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the therapeutic efficacy of TACE combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (TACE + Atez/Bev) compared to TACE alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted across three centers in China, encompassing 155 patients at the intermediate-stage of HCC. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias, with a ratio of 1:1. Primary outcomes were TACE-specific Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were assessed based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Adverse events (AEs) related to treatment were analyzed to evaluate safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before PSM, the TACE + Atez/Bev group demonstrated extended median OS (not reached vs 20.3 months, P = 0.004) and PFS (20.0 months vs 9.8 months, P = 0.029) compared to the TACE-alone group. The TACE + Atez/Bev group also had a higher ORR (60.9% vs 41.3%, P = 0.026) and DCR (89.1% vs 58.7%, P < 0.001) than the TACE-alone group. After applying the PSM, the study included 42 pairs of patients. Compared to the TACE-alone group, the combination therapy group also showed significantly longer median OS (not reached vs 21.4 months, P = 0.008) and PFS (21.7 vs 9.7 months, P = 0.009). The combination therapy group also had a higher ORR (66.7% vs 38.1%, P = 0.009) and DCR (92.9% vs 57.1%, P < 0.001). AEs in the combination therapy group were mostly manageable, with the most common being elevated liver transaminase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In treating intermediate-stage HCC, the survival benefit of combining TACE with atezolizumab and bevacizumab was significantly higher than TACE alone, and the treatment was well-tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"11 ","pages":"1079-1093"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11180435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S461630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with systemic therapy has shown significant efficacy for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the therapeutic efficacy of TACE combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (TACE + Atez/Bev) compared to TACE alone.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted across three centers in China, encompassing 155 patients at the intermediate-stage of HCC. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias, with a ratio of 1:1. Primary outcomes were TACE-specific Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were assessed based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Adverse events (AEs) related to treatment were analyzed to evaluate safety.

Results: Before PSM, the TACE + Atez/Bev group demonstrated extended median OS (not reached vs 20.3 months, P = 0.004) and PFS (20.0 months vs 9.8 months, P = 0.029) compared to the TACE-alone group. The TACE + Atez/Bev group also had a higher ORR (60.9% vs 41.3%, P = 0.026) and DCR (89.1% vs 58.7%, P < 0.001) than the TACE-alone group. After applying the PSM, the study included 42 pairs of patients. Compared to the TACE-alone group, the combination therapy group also showed significantly longer median OS (not reached vs 21.4 months, P = 0.008) and PFS (21.7 vs 9.7 months, P = 0.009). The combination therapy group also had a higher ORR (66.7% vs 38.1%, P = 0.009) and DCR (92.9% vs 57.1%, P < 0.001). AEs in the combination therapy group were mostly manageable, with the most common being elevated liver transaminase.

Conclusion: In treating intermediate-stage HCC, the survival benefit of combining TACE with atezolizumab and bevacizumab was significantly higher than TACE alone, and the treatment was well-tolerated.

经动脉化疗栓塞联合阿特珠单抗和贝伐单抗治疗中期肝细胞癌与单独经动脉化疗栓塞治疗的对比: 一项多中心回顾性研究。
目的:经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)与全身治疗相结合对中晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者有显著疗效。本研究旨在验证 TACE 联合阿特珠单抗和贝伐单抗(TACE + Atez/Bev)与单独 TACE 相比的疗效:在中国的三个中心开展了一项回顾性研究,共纳入155例HCC中期患者。研究采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)将选择偏倚降至最低,比例为 1:1。主要研究结果为TACE特异性无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。客观反应率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)根据修订后的实体瘤反应评估标准(mRECIST)进行评估。对与治疗相关的不良事件(AEs)进行了分析,以评估安全性:在PSM之前,TACE + Atez/Bev组的中位OS(未达到vs 20.3个月,P = 0.004)和PFS(20.0个月vs 9.8个月,P = 0.029)较TACE-单独组有所延长。TACE+Atez/Bev组的ORR(60.9% vs 41.3%,P = 0.026)和DCR(89.1% vs 58.7%,P < 0.001)也高于单纯TACE组。应用 PSM 后,该研究纳入了 42 对患者。与单用TACE组相比,联合治疗组的中位OS(未达到 vs 21.4个月,P = 0.008)和PFS(21.7 vs 9.7个月,P = 0.009)也明显更长。联合治疗组的 ORR(66.7% vs 38.1%,P = 0.009)和 DCR(92.9% vs 57.1%,P < 0.001)也更高。联合治疗组的AE大多可控,最常见的是肝转氨酶升高:结论:在治疗中晚期HCC时,TACE与阿特珠单抗和贝伐单抗联合治疗的生存获益明显高于单独TACE,且治疗耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信