Cannabis use trajectories over time in relation to minority stress and gender among sexual and gender minority people

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Annesa Flentje , Gowri Sunder , Alexis Ceja , Nadra E. Lisha , Torsten B. Neilands , Bradley E. Aouizerat , Micah E. Lubensky , Matthew R. Capriotti , Zubin Dastur , Mitchell R. Lunn , Juno Obedin-Maliver
{"title":"Cannabis use trajectories over time in relation to minority stress and gender among sexual and gender minority people","authors":"Annesa Flentje ,&nbsp;Gowri Sunder ,&nbsp;Alexis Ceja ,&nbsp;Nadra E. Lisha ,&nbsp;Torsten B. Neilands ,&nbsp;Bradley E. Aouizerat ,&nbsp;Micah E. Lubensky ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Capriotti ,&nbsp;Zubin Dastur ,&nbsp;Mitchell R. Lunn ,&nbsp;Juno Obedin-Maliver","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Substance use disparities among sexual and gender minority (SGM) people are attributed to minority stress, but few studies have examined minority stress and cannabis use over time or investigated differences in cannabis use trajectories by less-studied gender subgroups. We examined if longitudinal cannabis use trajectories are related to baseline minority stressors and if gender differences persisted after accounting for minority stress. Cannabis use risk was measured annually over four years (2017–2021) within a longitudinal cohort study of SGM adults in the United States (<em>N</em> = 11,813). Discrimination and victimization, internalized stigma, disclosure and concealment, and safety and acceptance comprised minority stress (<em>n</em> = 5,673). Latent class growth curve mixture models identified five cannabis use trajectories: ‘low or no risk’, ‘low moderate risk’, ‘high moderate risk’, ‘steep risk increase’, and ‘highest risk’. Participants who reported past-year discrimination and/or victimization at baseline had greater odds of membership in any cannabis risk category compared to the ‘low risk’ category (odds ratios [OR] 1.17–1.33). Internalized stigma was related to ‘high moderate’ and ‘highest risk’ cannabis use (ORs 1.27–1.38). After accounting for minority stress, compared to cisgender men, gender expansive people and transgender men had higher odds of ‘low moderate risk’ (ORs 1.61, 1.67) or ‘high moderate risk’ (ORs 2.09, 1.99), and transgender men had higher odds of ‘highest risk’ (OR 2.36) cannabis use. This study indicates minority stress is related to prospective cannabis use risk trajectories among SGM people, and transgender men and gender expansive people have greater odds of trajectories reflecting cannabis use risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030646032400128X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Substance use disparities among sexual and gender minority (SGM) people are attributed to minority stress, but few studies have examined minority stress and cannabis use over time or investigated differences in cannabis use trajectories by less-studied gender subgroups. We examined if longitudinal cannabis use trajectories are related to baseline minority stressors and if gender differences persisted after accounting for minority stress. Cannabis use risk was measured annually over four years (2017–2021) within a longitudinal cohort study of SGM adults in the United States (N = 11,813). Discrimination and victimization, internalized stigma, disclosure and concealment, and safety and acceptance comprised minority stress (n = 5,673). Latent class growth curve mixture models identified five cannabis use trajectories: ‘low or no risk’, ‘low moderate risk’, ‘high moderate risk’, ‘steep risk increase’, and ‘highest risk’. Participants who reported past-year discrimination and/or victimization at baseline had greater odds of membership in any cannabis risk category compared to the ‘low risk’ category (odds ratios [OR] 1.17–1.33). Internalized stigma was related to ‘high moderate’ and ‘highest risk’ cannabis use (ORs 1.27–1.38). After accounting for minority stress, compared to cisgender men, gender expansive people and transgender men had higher odds of ‘low moderate risk’ (ORs 1.61, 1.67) or ‘high moderate risk’ (ORs 2.09, 1.99), and transgender men had higher odds of ‘highest risk’ (OR 2.36) cannabis use. This study indicates minority stress is related to prospective cannabis use risk trajectories among SGM people, and transgender men and gender expansive people have greater odds of trajectories reflecting cannabis use risk.

性少数群体和性别少数群体中大麻使用随时间变化的轨迹与少数群体压力和性别的关系
性少数群体和性别少数群体(SGM)在药物使用方面的差异被归因于少数群体的压力,但很少有研究对少数群体的压力和大麻使用情况进行长期研究,也很少有研究对研究较少的性别亚群体的大麻使用轨迹差异进行调查。我们研究了纵向大麻使用轨迹是否与基线少数群体压力因素有关,以及在考虑了少数群体压力因素后,性别差异是否仍然存在。在对美国 SGM 成年人(N = 11,813)进行的纵向队列研究中,我们对四年内(2017-2021 年)每年的大麻使用风险进行了测量。歧视和受害、内化污名、披露和隐瞒以及安全和接受构成了少数群体压力(n = 5,673)。潜类增长曲线混合模型确定了五种大麻使用轨迹:"低或无风险"、"低中度风险"、"高中度风险"、"风险急剧增加 "和 "最高风险"。与 "低风险 "类别相比,基线时报告过去一年受到歧视和/或伤害的参与者属于任何大麻风险类别的几率更大(几率比 [OR] 1.17-1.33)。内化成见与 "中度高风险 "和 "最高风险 "大麻使用有关(ORs 1.27-1.38)。考虑到少数群体压力后,与顺性别男性相比,性别扩张者和变性男性使用大麻的 "低中度风险"(ORs 1.61,1.67)或 "高中度风险"(ORs 2.09,1.99)几率更高,而变性男性使用大麻的 "最高风险"(ORs 2.36)几率更高。这项研究表明,少数群体压力与 SGM 人士未来使用大麻的风险轨迹有关,而变性男性和性别扩张人士使用大麻风险轨迹的几率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信