Patient perspectives on vasectomy: findings from a TikTok® content analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Lazaros Tzelves, Ali Talyshinskii, Carlotta Nedbal, Ioannis Mykoniatis, Christian Beisland, Ingunn Roth, Arman Tsaturyan, Vincent de Coninck, Etienne Xavier Keller, Bhaskar K Somani, Patrick Juliebø-Jones
{"title":"Patient perspectives on vasectomy: findings from a TikTok® content analysis.","authors":"Lazaros Tzelves, Ali Talyshinskii, Carlotta Nedbal, Ioannis Mykoniatis, Christian Beisland, Ingunn Roth, Arman Tsaturyan, Vincent de Coninck, Etienne Xavier Keller, Bhaskar K Somani, Patrick Juliebø-Jones","doi":"10.1038/s41443-024-00931-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media is increasingly used as a platform for patients to explore health care information. Our objective was to study the content on TikTok<sup>®</sup> in order to gain insight into the perspectives shared by the public on vasectomy. A search was performed using the hashtag ´#vasectomy´ on 12.20.2023 and the top 100 video posts from persons self-identifying as patients were included. Using an adaptation of a previously published system, a framework was created for organising and categorising the data related to vasectomy. Domains covered included reason for vasectomy, complications, vasectomy as a controversial topic in society and reference to the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. Most content originated from the United States (85.0%) and the median number of views per video was 261 200 (interquartile range (IQR) 8416-1 800 000). In 12.0% of posts, the individual clearly stated that they were under 30 years of age. Two of the commonest topics to be addressed in the videos were recovery (41.0%) and pain (40.0%). 30.0% discussed the reason for undergoing vasectomy. Reasons included women's rights (12%), safety over tubal ligation (5.0%) and desire to be childless (4.0%). 9.0% referred to the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. Complications were discussed in 19.0% including vasectomy failure (12.0%). 23.0% contained factually incorrect medical information. 31.0% of videos included the user voicing that vasectomy was considered to be a controversial subject. More than half of the videos (61.0%) were positive regarding the vasectomy process. Our findings reveal that vasectomy receives very high engagement on social media. This study confirms that patients do use it to share their experiences, both positive and negative. Misconceptions regarding this contraception method are common among the public and the urological community should work to address this.</p>","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00931-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media is increasingly used as a platform for patients to explore health care information. Our objective was to study the content on TikTok® in order to gain insight into the perspectives shared by the public on vasectomy. A search was performed using the hashtag ´#vasectomy´ on 12.20.2023 and the top 100 video posts from persons self-identifying as patients were included. Using an adaptation of a previously published system, a framework was created for organising and categorising the data related to vasectomy. Domains covered included reason for vasectomy, complications, vasectomy as a controversial topic in society and reference to the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. Most content originated from the United States (85.0%) and the median number of views per video was 261 200 (interquartile range (IQR) 8416-1 800 000). In 12.0% of posts, the individual clearly stated that they were under 30 years of age. Two of the commonest topics to be addressed in the videos were recovery (41.0%) and pain (40.0%). 30.0% discussed the reason for undergoing vasectomy. Reasons included women's rights (12%), safety over tubal ligation (5.0%) and desire to be childless (4.0%). 9.0% referred to the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. Complications were discussed in 19.0% including vasectomy failure (12.0%). 23.0% contained factually incorrect medical information. 31.0% of videos included the user voicing that vasectomy was considered to be a controversial subject. More than half of the videos (61.0%) were positive regarding the vasectomy process. Our findings reveal that vasectomy receives very high engagement on social media. This study confirms that patients do use it to share their experiences, both positive and negative. Misconceptions regarding this contraception method are common among the public and the urological community should work to address this.

患者对输精管切除术的看法:TikTok® 内容分析的结果。
社交媒体越来越多地被用作患者探索医疗保健信息的平台。我们的目的是研究 TikTok® 上的内容,以便深入了解公众对输精管切除术的看法。我们在 2023 年 12 月 20 日使用标签 "#输精管结扎术 "进行了搜索,并收录了自称患者的人发布的前 100 条视频帖子。通过对以前发布的系统进行改编,创建了一个框架,用于组织和分类与输精管结扎术有关的数据。涉及的领域包括输精管结扎术的原因、并发症、输精管结扎术在社会上的争议性话题以及对 2022 年多布斯诉杰克逊案裁决的参考。大部分内容来自美国(85.0%),每条视频的浏览量中位数为 261200 次(四分位距(IQR)为 8416-1800000 次)。在 12.0% 的帖子中,当事人明确表示自己未满 30 岁。视频中最常见的两个主题是恢复(41.0%)和疼痛(40.0%)。30.0%的视频讨论了接受输精管结扎手术的原因。原因包括妇女权利(12%)、结扎比输卵管结扎安全(5.0%)和希望无子女(4.0%)。9.0% 的人提到了多布斯诉杰克逊案的裁决。讨论并发症的占 19.0%,包括输精管结扎术失败(12.0%)。23.0% 的视频包含与事实不符的医疗信息。31.0%的视频中用户表示输精管结扎术是一个有争议的话题。超过半数的视频(61.0%)对输精管结扎过程持肯定态度。我们的研究结果表明,输精管结扎术在社交媒体上的参与度非常高。这项研究证实,患者确实使用社交媒体来分享他们的经历,包括正面的和负面的。公众对这种避孕方法的误解很普遍,泌尿外科界应努力解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impotence Research
International Journal of Impotence Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
19.20%
发文量
140
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信