Everyday discrimination and satisfaction with nature experiences.

Frontiers in epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fepid.2024.1212114
Leah H Schinasi, Jourdyn A Lawrence
{"title":"Everyday discrimination and satisfaction with nature experiences.","authors":"Leah H Schinasi, Jourdyn A Lawrence","doi":"10.3389/fepid.2024.1212114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is growing interest in creating public green spaces to promote health. Yet, discussions about these efforts often overlook how experiences of chronic discrimination-which may manifest as racism, sexism, or homophobia, and more-could undermine satisfaction with nature experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the 2018 wave of the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) General Social Survey (GSS), we quantified associations of frequency of everyday discrimination, operationalized using the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS, the primary independent variable), with respondents' perceptions of nature experiences and with their reported time spent in nature. Specifically, we quantified associations with the following three variables: (1) dissatisfaction with day-to-day experiences of nature, (2) not spending as much time as they would like in natural environments, and (3) usually spending at least one day per week in nature. We used survey-weighted robust Poisson models to estimate overall associations, and also stratified analyses by racial/ethnic and gender identity categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 768 GSS respondents, 14% reported dissatisfaction with nature experiences, 36% reported not spending as much time as they would like in nature, and 33% reported that they did not spend at least one day per week in nature. The median non-standardized EDS, coded such that a higher value indicates greater frequency of discrimination, was 11 (interquartile range: 8, 15). Prevalence of reporting dissatisfaction with day-to-day experiences in nature was 7% higher in association with every one unit increase in EDS score above the median (PR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11). The prevalence of reporting not spending as much time as one would like in nature was 2% higher for every unit increase in higher than median everyday discrimination frequency (PR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.05). Higher than median frequency in everyday discrimination was not associated with spending less than one day per week in nature. Race/ethnicity and gender identity did not modify associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater frequency of everyday discrimination is associated with less satisfaction with experiences in nature. This relationship could undermine efforts to promote health equity through green interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73083,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in epidemiology","volume":"4 ","pages":"1212114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11169619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2024.1212114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is growing interest in creating public green spaces to promote health. Yet, discussions about these efforts often overlook how experiences of chronic discrimination-which may manifest as racism, sexism, or homophobia, and more-could undermine satisfaction with nature experiences.

Methods: Using data from the 2018 wave of the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) General Social Survey (GSS), we quantified associations of frequency of everyday discrimination, operationalized using the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS, the primary independent variable), with respondents' perceptions of nature experiences and with their reported time spent in nature. Specifically, we quantified associations with the following three variables: (1) dissatisfaction with day-to-day experiences of nature, (2) not spending as much time as they would like in natural environments, and (3) usually spending at least one day per week in nature. We used survey-weighted robust Poisson models to estimate overall associations, and also stratified analyses by racial/ethnic and gender identity categories.

Results: Of 768 GSS respondents, 14% reported dissatisfaction with nature experiences, 36% reported not spending as much time as they would like in nature, and 33% reported that they did not spend at least one day per week in nature. The median non-standardized EDS, coded such that a higher value indicates greater frequency of discrimination, was 11 (interquartile range: 8, 15). Prevalence of reporting dissatisfaction with day-to-day experiences in nature was 7% higher in association with every one unit increase in EDS score above the median (PR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11). The prevalence of reporting not spending as much time as one would like in nature was 2% higher for every unit increase in higher than median everyday discrimination frequency (PR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.05). Higher than median frequency in everyday discrimination was not associated with spending less than one day per week in nature. Race/ethnicity and gender identity did not modify associations.

Conclusion: Greater frequency of everyday discrimination is associated with less satisfaction with experiences in nature. This relationship could undermine efforts to promote health equity through green interventions.

日常歧视和对自然体验的满意度。
导言:人们对创造公共绿地以促进健康的兴趣与日俱增。然而,关于这些努力的讨论往往忽视了长期歧视的经历--可能表现为种族主义、性别歧视或仇视同性恋等--如何影响人们对自然体验的满意度:利用美国国家舆论研究中心(NORC)2018 年的一般社会调查(GSS)数据,我们量化了日常歧视频率(使用日常歧视量表(EDS,主要自变量)进行操作)与受访者对自然体验的感知及其报告的在自然中花费的时间之间的关联。具体来说,我们量化了与以下三个变量之间的关联:(1)对日常自然体验的不满意度;(2)在自然环境中花费的时间不如预期;(3)通常每周至少有一天在自然环境中度过。我们使用调查加权稳健泊松模型来估计总体关联,并按种族/族裔和性别认同类别进行分层分析:在 768 名 GSS 受访者中,14% 的人表示对大自然体验不满意,36% 的人表示在大自然中度过的时间不如预期,33% 的人表示每周至少有一天没有在大自然中度过。非标准化 EDS 的中位数为 11(四分位间范围:8-15)。当 EDS 分数比中位数每增加一个单位时,对每天在大自然中的经历表示不满意的比例就会增加 7%(PR:1.07,95% CI:1.02-1.11)。日常歧视频率高于中位数,每增加一个单位,表示在大自然中度过的时间不如意的发生率就会增加 2%(PR:1.02,95% CI:1.00-1.05)。日常歧视频率高于中位数与每周亲近自然的时间少于一天无关。种族/民族和性别认同并不会改变两者之间的关联:结论:日常歧视频率越高,对自然体验的满意度越低。这种关系可能会破坏通过绿色干预来促进健康公平的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信