Towards anti-racist futures: a scoping review exploring educational interventions that address systemic racism in post graduate medical education.

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Baijayanta Mukhopadhyay, Vivetha Thambinathan, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella
{"title":"Towards anti-racist futures: a scoping review exploring educational interventions that address systemic racism in post graduate medical education.","authors":"Baijayanta Mukhopadhyay, Vivetha Thambinathan, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10343-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 2020, brought to the forefront by movements such as Black Lives Matter and Idle No More, it has been widely acknowledged that systemic racism contributes to racially differentiated health outcomes. Health professional educators have been called to address such disparities within healthcare, policy, and practice. To tackle structural racism within healthcare, one avenue that has emerged is the creation of medical education interventions within postgraduate residency medical programming. The objective of this scoping review is to examine the current literature on anti-racist educational interventions, that integrate a systemic or structural view of racism, within postgraduate medical education. Through the identification and analysis of 23 papers, this review identified three major components of interest across medical interventions, including (a) conceptualization, (b) pedagogical issues, and (c) outcomes & evaluation. There were overlapping points of discussion and analysis within each of these components. Conceptualization addressed how researchers conceptualized racism in different ways, the range of curricular content educators chose to challenge racism, and the absence of community's role in curricular development. Pedagogical issues addressed knowledge vs. skills-based teaching, and tensions between one-time workshops and integrative curriculum. Outcomes and evaluation highlighted self-reported Likert scales as dominant types of evaluation, self-evaluation in educational interventions, and misalignments between intervention outcomes and learning objectives. The findings are unique in their in-depth exploration of anti-racist medical interventions within postgraduate medical education programming, specifically in relation to efforts to address systemic and structural racism. The findings contribute a meaningful review of the current state of the field of medical education and generate new conversations about future possibilities for a broader anti-racist health professions curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10343-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2020, brought to the forefront by movements such as Black Lives Matter and Idle No More, it has been widely acknowledged that systemic racism contributes to racially differentiated health outcomes. Health professional educators have been called to address such disparities within healthcare, policy, and practice. To tackle structural racism within healthcare, one avenue that has emerged is the creation of medical education interventions within postgraduate residency medical programming. The objective of this scoping review is to examine the current literature on anti-racist educational interventions, that integrate a systemic or structural view of racism, within postgraduate medical education. Through the identification and analysis of 23 papers, this review identified three major components of interest across medical interventions, including (a) conceptualization, (b) pedagogical issues, and (c) outcomes & evaluation. There were overlapping points of discussion and analysis within each of these components. Conceptualization addressed how researchers conceptualized racism in different ways, the range of curricular content educators chose to challenge racism, and the absence of community's role in curricular development. Pedagogical issues addressed knowledge vs. skills-based teaching, and tensions between one-time workshops and integrative curriculum. Outcomes and evaluation highlighted self-reported Likert scales as dominant types of evaluation, self-evaluation in educational interventions, and misalignments between intervention outcomes and learning objectives. The findings are unique in their in-depth exploration of anti-racist medical interventions within postgraduate medical education programming, specifically in relation to efforts to address systemic and structural racism. The findings contribute a meaningful review of the current state of the field of medical education and generate new conversations about future possibilities for a broader anti-racist health professions curriculum.

迈向反种族主义的未来:探索解决医学研究生教育中系统性种族主义的教育干预措施的范围界定审查。
自 2020 年以来,"黑人生命至上 "和 "不再闲置 "等运动将这一问题推到了风口浪尖,人们普遍认识到,系统性种族主义导致了不同种族的健康结果。卫生专业教育工作者被要求解决医疗保健、政策和实践中的这种差异。为了解决医疗保健中的结构性种族主义问题,出现的一个途径是在研究生住院医师培训计划中制定医学教育干预措施。本次范围界定综述的目的是研究当前有关反种族主义教育干预措施的文献,这些干预措施将系统性或结构性的种族主义观点纳入了研究生医学教育中。通过对 23 篇论文的识别和分析,本综述确定了医学干预的三个主要关注点,包括 (a) 概念化、(b) 教学问题和 (c) 结果与评估。每个部分的讨论和分析都有重叠点。概念化涉及研究人员如何以不同的方式将种族主义概念化、教育者选择挑战种族主义的课程内容范围以及社区在课程开发中的作用缺失。教学问题涉及以知识为基础的教学与以技能为基础的教学,以及一次性研讨会与综合课程之间的矛盾。成果与评价强调了自我报告的李克特量表作为主要的评价类型、教育干预中的自我评价以及干预成果与学习目标之间的不一致。研究结果的独特之处在于深入探讨了医学研究生教育计划中的反种族主义医学干预措施,特别是与解决系统性和结构性种族主义有关的干预措施。研究结果对医学教育领域的现状进行了有意义的回顾,并就未来更广泛的反种族主义健康专业课程的可能性进行了新的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信