Assessing knowledge of migrant sexual reproductive health and rights: a national cross-sectional survey among health professionals in Sweden.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1356418
Birgitta Essén, Ayanthi Wickramasinghe, Lise Eriksson, Irina Vartanova, Andrey Tibajev, Pontus Strimling
{"title":"Assessing knowledge of migrant sexual reproductive health and rights: a national cross-sectional survey among health professionals in Sweden.","authors":"Birgitta Essén, Ayanthi Wickramasinghe, Lise Eriksson, Irina Vartanova, Andrey Tibajev, Pontus Strimling","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1356418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the commitment of the Swedish government to ensuring equal access to Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights services for all citizens, shortcomings persist among the migrant population. In cases where healthcare providers lack sufficient knowledge or hold misconceptions and biases about these contentious issues, it can lead to the delivery of suboptimal care. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the level of knowledge of Swedish healthcare providers on global and Swedish migrant Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire consisting of seven questions related to global and Swedish migrant Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights. The questionnaire was distributed among midwives, nurses, gynecologists and obstetricians, and hospital social workers (<i>N</i> = 731). The analysis was guided by the Factfulness framework developed by Hans Rosling to identify disparities between healthcare providers' viewpoints and evidence-based knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an overall lack of knowledge among the health care providers on these issues. The highest correct responses were on the question on abandonment of female genital cutting/mutilation after migration (74%). The findings indicated that healthcare providers originating from Sweden, physicians, those with fewer years of clinical experience, and exhibiting more migrant-friendly attitudes, demonstrated a higher level of knowledge regarding global and Swedish migrant Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that healthcare providers lacked knowledge of global and Swedish migrant Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights, which was almost uniformly distributed, except among those with more comprehensive and recent education. Contrary to expectations, healthcare professionals did not primarily rely on their education and experiences but were influenced by their personal values and opinions. The study underscores the importance of upgrading knowledge in Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights and encourages policymakers, professionals, and students to base their opinions on well-founded facts, particularly in the context of a diverse and globalized society.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11169828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1356418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the commitment of the Swedish government to ensuring equal access to Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights services for all citizens, shortcomings persist among the migrant population. In cases where healthcare providers lack sufficient knowledge or hold misconceptions and biases about these contentious issues, it can lead to the delivery of suboptimal care. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the level of knowledge of Swedish healthcare providers on global and Swedish migrant Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights.

Methods: A national cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire consisting of seven questions related to global and Swedish migrant Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights. The questionnaire was distributed among midwives, nurses, gynecologists and obstetricians, and hospital social workers (N = 731). The analysis was guided by the Factfulness framework developed by Hans Rosling to identify disparities between healthcare providers' viewpoints and evidence-based knowledge.

Results: There was an overall lack of knowledge among the health care providers on these issues. The highest correct responses were on the question on abandonment of female genital cutting/mutilation after migration (74%). The findings indicated that healthcare providers originating from Sweden, physicians, those with fewer years of clinical experience, and exhibiting more migrant-friendly attitudes, demonstrated a higher level of knowledge regarding global and Swedish migrant Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that healthcare providers lacked knowledge of global and Swedish migrant Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights, which was almost uniformly distributed, except among those with more comprehensive and recent education. Contrary to expectations, healthcare professionals did not primarily rely on their education and experiences but were influenced by their personal values and opinions. The study underscores the importance of upgrading knowledge in Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights and encourages policymakers, professionals, and students to base their opinions on well-founded facts, particularly in the context of a diverse and globalized society.

评估对移民性生殖健康和权利的了解:对瑞典卫生专业人员的全国横断面调查。
导言:尽管瑞典政府承诺确保所有公民都能平等地获得性生殖健康和权利服务,但在移民人口中仍然存在缺陷。如果医疗服务提供者对这些有争议的问题缺乏足够的了解或持有误解和偏见,就会导致提供的医疗服务不尽如人意。因此,本研究旨在评估瑞典医疗服务提供者对全球和瑞典移民性生殖健康与权利的了解程度:这项全国性横断面研究使用了一份调查问卷,其中包括七个与全球和瑞典移民性生殖健康与权利相关的问题。调查问卷的发放对象包括助产士、护士、妇产科医生和医院社工(N = 731)。分析以汉斯-罗斯林(Hans Rosling)提出的 "事实真相"(Factfulness)框架为指导,以确定医疗服务提供者的观点与循证知识之间的差异:结果:医疗服务提供者对这些问题总体缺乏了解。回答正确率最高的是关于移民后放弃切割/残害女性生殖器官的问题(74%)。研究结果表明,来自瑞典的医疗服务提供者、医生、临床经验较少的医疗服务提供者以及表现出更多对移民友好态度的医疗服务提供者,对全球和瑞典移民的性与生殖健康及权利的了解程度较高:本研究表明,医疗服务提供者缺乏对全球和瑞典移民性与生殖健康和权利的了解,除了那些受过更全面和更近期教育的医疗服务提供者外,其他医疗服务提供者几乎都缺乏这方面的知识。与预期相反,医疗保健专业人员并不是主要依靠他们的教育和经验,而是受到他们个人价值观和观点的影响。这项研究强调了提升性健康和生殖权利知识的重要性,并鼓励政策制定者、专业人员和学生将其观点建立在有充分依据的事实基础之上,尤其是在多元化和全球化的社会背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信