Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the french version of the "defense and veterans pain rating scale" for acute and chronic pain: A prospective clinical study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae049
Szilard Laszlo Safran, David Follonier, Eric Weber, Petra Vayne-Bossert, Ulrike Ahrendts, Benno Rehberg-Klug
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the french version of the \"defense and veterans pain rating scale\" for acute and chronic pain: A prospective clinical study.","authors":"Szilard Laszlo Safran, David Follonier, Eric Weber, Petra Vayne-Bossert, Ulrike Ahrendts, Benno Rehberg-Klug","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain assessment and proper evaluation of pain is a prerequisite for treatment of acute and chronic pain. Until now, most evaluations use only resting pain intensity and a unidimensional scale, although multidimensional pain assessment and especially assessment of functional pain impact on activities is recommended. The \"Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale\" (DVPRS) permits this multidimensional assessment, but no validated French translation exists.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To validate the French translation of the multidimensional DVPRS, called Functional Pain Scale (FPS) in multiple settings of acute and chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two large hospitals in the French-speaking region of Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 232 patients from February 2022 to January 2023. Patients with acute or chronic pain in different settings received a paper questionnaire with both the NRS and the Functional Pain Scale and a customized evaluation questionnaire. Correlation of FPS and NRS, psychometric properties and patient preferences were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the whole group of 232 patients, correlation of FPS and NRS was high, as well for all subgroups. The multi-item FPS scale showed excellent internal consistency. A large majority of patients, even those >75 years old, preferred FPS over NRS and stated that the FPS was easy to use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study confirms that the French translation of the DVPRS (= Functional Pain Scale) is a valid measurement instrument for acute and chronic pain evaluation in a wide range of patient groups, and easy to use by patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain assessment and proper evaluation of pain is a prerequisite for treatment of acute and chronic pain. Until now, most evaluations use only resting pain intensity and a unidimensional scale, although multidimensional pain assessment and especially assessment of functional pain impact on activities is recommended. The "Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale" (DVPRS) permits this multidimensional assessment, but no validated French translation exists.

Objectives: To validate the French translation of the multidimensional DVPRS, called Functional Pain Scale (FPS) in multiple settings of acute and chronic pain.

Study design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Two large hospitals in the French-speaking region of Switzerland.

Methods: We recruited 232 patients from February 2022 to January 2023. Patients with acute or chronic pain in different settings received a paper questionnaire with both the NRS and the Functional Pain Scale and a customized evaluation questionnaire. Correlation of FPS and NRS, psychometric properties and patient preferences were analysed.

Results: For the whole group of 232 patients, correlation of FPS and NRS was high, as well for all subgroups. The multi-item FPS scale showed excellent internal consistency. A large majority of patients, even those >75 years old, preferred FPS over NRS and stated that the FPS was easy to use.

Conclusions: The study confirms that the French translation of the DVPRS (= Functional Pain Scale) is a valid measurement instrument for acute and chronic pain evaluation in a wide range of patient groups, and easy to use by patients.

针对急性和慢性疼痛的法国版 "防御和退伍军人疼痛评分量表 "的跨文化适应性和心理计量学验证:前瞻性临床研究。
背景:疼痛评估和对疼痛的正确评价是治疗急性和慢性疼痛的先决条件。迄今为止,大多数评估仅使用静息痛强度和单维度量表,但建议进行多维度疼痛评估,尤其是评估功能性疼痛对活动的影响。国防和退伍军人疼痛评分量表"(DVPRS)允许进行这种多维度评估,但目前还没有经过验证的法文译本:研究设计:前瞻性观察研究:研究设计:前瞻性观察研究:研究设计:前瞻性观察研究:我们在 2022 年 2 月至 2023 年 1 月期间招募了 232 名患者。不同情况下的急性或慢性疼痛患者均接受了一份包含 NRS 和功能性疼痛量表的纸质问卷以及一份定制的评估问卷。对 FPS 和 NRS 的相关性、心理测量特性和患者偏好进行了分析:在全部 232 名患者中,FPS 和 NRS 的相关性很高,所有亚组的相关性也很高。多项目 FPS 量表显示出良好的内部一致性。与 NRS 相比,绝大多数患者,甚至是 75 岁以上的患者,都更喜欢使用 FPS,并表示 FPS 易于使用:该研究证实,DVPRS(= 功能性疼痛量表)的法文译本是一种有效的测量工具,可用于对各种患者群体的急性和慢性疼痛进行评估,而且患者易于使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信