EEG Correlates of Suggestion-Induced Stroop Interference Reduction in High-Suggestible Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Aman Kumar Raturi, Sreelatha S Narayanan, S P K Jena
{"title":"EEG Correlates of Suggestion-Induced Stroop Interference Reduction in High-Suggestible Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Aman Kumar Raturi, Sreelatha S Narayanan, S P K Jena","doi":"10.1080/00207144.2024.2356856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have explored the impact of suggestion on the Stroop effect, aiming to understand how effective suggestion is in modulating this phenomenon. The suggestion effect has been replicated in multiple studies, supporting its robustness, but lacks systematic evaluation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant English-language studies from PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ScienceDirect since databases inception until January 2023. Quality of included studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal checklist, and potential publication biases were assessed. Subgroup analyses were also performed, and effect sizes were estimated using Hedges' g and analyzed using random effects model. The systematic review was comprised of 19 studies. For the meta-analysis, 14 studies examined the suggestion effect on Stroop interference effect (SIE), while six studies investigated suggestion effects on accuracy. Results have revealed significant overall effects of suggestion on Stroop performance in participants, as evidenced by SIE and accuracy. Subgroup analysis based on types of suggestion demonstrated a significant effect on SIE. Six EEG/ERP studies have also been discussed in the context of the review.</p>","PeriodicalId":13896,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2024.2356856","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have explored the impact of suggestion on the Stroop effect, aiming to understand how effective suggestion is in modulating this phenomenon. The suggestion effect has been replicated in multiple studies, supporting its robustness, but lacks systematic evaluation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant English-language studies from PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ScienceDirect since databases inception until January 2023. Quality of included studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal checklist, and potential publication biases were assessed. Subgroup analyses were also performed, and effect sizes were estimated using Hedges' g and analyzed using random effects model. The systematic review was comprised of 19 studies. For the meta-analysis, 14 studies examined the suggestion effect on Stroop interference effect (SIE), while six studies investigated suggestion effects on accuracy. Results have revealed significant overall effects of suggestion on Stroop performance in participants, as evidenced by SIE and accuracy. Subgroup analysis based on types of suggestion demonstrated a significant effect on SIE. Six EEG/ERP studies have also been discussed in the context of the review.

高暗示性个体在暗示诱导下减少 Stroop 干扰的脑电图相关性:系统回顾与元分析》。
有研究探讨了暗示对斯特罗普效应的影响,旨在了解暗示在调节这一现象方面的有效性。暗示效应已在多项研究中得到重复,证明了其稳健性,但缺乏系统性评估。我们对 PubMed、Web of Science、PsycINFO、Scopus 和 ScienceDirect 数据库中的相关英文研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,研究时间从数据库建立之初到 2023 年 1 月。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)的评估清单对纳入研究的质量进行了评估,并对潜在的发表偏差进行了评估。此外,还进行了分组分析,并使用 Hedges'g 估算效应大小,使用随机效应模型进行分析。系统综述由 19 项研究组成。在荟萃分析中,14 项研究考察了暗示对 Stroop 干扰效应(SIE)的影响,6 项研究考察了暗示对准确性的影响。结果表明,暗示对受试者的 Stroop 表现有明显的整体影响,具体表现在 SIE 和准确性上。基于暗示类型的分组分析表明,暗示对 SIE 有显著影响。本综述还讨论了六项 EEG/ERP 研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
29.40%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The IJCEH will keep you up to date on the latest clinical and research findings in the field, thanks to leading scholars from around the world examining such topics as: •Hypnotherapeutic Techniques •Pain and Anxiety Relief •Disociative Identity Disorder (Multiple Personality Disorder) •Altered States of Consciousness •Delayed Recall •Dissociation •Forensic Uses of Hypnosis •Hypnosis in Eyewitness Memory •Hypnotic Induction in Dentistry •Hypnotizability •Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder •Self-Hypnosis •Control of Smoking •Weight Management •Ego State Hypnotherapy •Theories of Hypnosis •Physiological & Psychological Bases of Hypnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信