High Quality of Care Delivery Improves Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Outcomes After Breast Augmentation.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Kim Phi Luong, Marloes H P Ter Stege, Stefan Hummelink, Laura Zaal, Harm P Slijper, Dietmar J O Ulrich
{"title":"High Quality of Care Delivery Improves Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Outcomes After Breast Augmentation.","authors":"Kim Phi Luong, Marloes H P Ter Stege, Stefan Hummelink, Laura Zaal, Harm P Slijper, Dietmar J O Ulrich","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast augmentation is one of the most common aesthetic procedures worldwide. Most studies have focused on evaluating the outcome with validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and factors that may influence them. However, the influence of care delivery, which can be measured with patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), is rarely considered in studies of breast augmentation patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study we aimed to evaluate the associations between PREMs and PROMs in patients who underwent breast augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter cohort study was conducted in breast augmentation patients. Patients completed PREMs, including items such as communication between physician and patient, expectation management, welcome, and hygiene, and the BREAST-Q PROM (satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being) preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations between PREMs and PROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 329 patients were included between 2018 and 2022. Univariate regression analysis showed a positive association between PREM and PROM scales. The feeling of being heard (B = -38.39 and B = -18.90), the opportunity to ask questions (B = -9.21), and trust in their physician (B = -39.08) had the highest association with change in the 4 BREAST-Q scales. The multivariable regression analysis showed that the variance in PROMs related to changes in PREMs (19%) was little influenced by patient characteristics (1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient outcomes are more positive after breast augmentation when patients feel they are being heard, have the opportunity to ask questions, and have trust in their physician. Future studies should be targeted at optimizing patient-reported experience to investigate whether this improves patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"NP686-NP694"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast augmentation is one of the most common aesthetic procedures worldwide. Most studies have focused on evaluating the outcome with validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and factors that may influence them. However, the influence of care delivery, which can be measured with patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), is rarely considered in studies of breast augmentation patients.

Objectives: In this study we aimed to evaluate the associations between PREMs and PROMs in patients who underwent breast augmentation.

Methods: A multicenter cohort study was conducted in breast augmentation patients. Patients completed PREMs, including items such as communication between physician and patient, expectation management, welcome, and hygiene, and the BREAST-Q PROM (satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being) preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations between PREMs and PROMs.

Results: Overall, 329 patients were included between 2018 and 2022. Univariate regression analysis showed a positive association between PREM and PROM scales. The feeling of being heard (B = -38.39 and B = -18.90), the opportunity to ask questions (B = -9.21), and trust in their physician (B = -39.08) had the highest association with change in the 4 BREAST-Q scales. The multivariable regression analysis showed that the variance in PROMs related to changes in PREMs (19%) was little influenced by patient characteristics (1%).

Conclusions: Patient outcomes are more positive after breast augmentation when patients feel they are being heard, have the opportunity to ask questions, and have trust in their physician. Future studies should be targeted at optimizing patient-reported experience to investigate whether this improves patient-reported outcomes.

Level of evidence: 3:

高质量的医疗服务可提高隆胸术后患者的满意度和生活质量。
背景介绍隆胸手术是全球最常见的美容手术之一。大多数研究都侧重于通过有效的患者报告结果测量(PROMs)来评估结果以及可能影响结果的因素。然而,在隆胸术患者中,可以通过患者报告的体验指标(PREMs)来衡量的护理服务的影响却很少:本研究旨在评估隆胸患者的 PREMs 和 PROMs 之间的关联:方法:对隆胸患者进行了一项多中心队列研究。患者在术前和术后六个月完成了 PREMs,包括医患沟通、期望管理、欢迎和卫生等方面,以及 BREAST-Q PROM 乳房满意度、社会心理、身体和性健康。回归分析用于研究 PREMs 与 PROMs 之间的关联:2018-2022年间共纳入329名患者。单变量回归分析显示,PREMs与PROMs量表之间存在正相关。被倾听的感觉(B=-38.39 和 B=-18.90)、提问的机会(B=-9.21)和对医生的信任(B=-39.08)与四个 BREAST-Q 量表的变化关联度最高。多变量回归分析显示,与 PREMs 变化相关的 PROMs 变异(19%)几乎不受患者特征(1%)的影响:结论:假体隆胸术后,如果患者感觉自己的意见被倾听、有机会提问并对医生信任,那么患者的治疗效果会更加积极。今后的研究应以优化患者报告的体验为目标,调查这是否会改善患者报告的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信