Comparison of Childless and Partnerless Vasectomy Rates Before and After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Vi Nguyen, Michelle K Li, Michelle C Leach, Darshan P Patel, Tung-Chin Hsieh
{"title":"Comparison of Childless and Partnerless Vasectomy Rates Before and After <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</i>.","authors":"Vi Nguyen, Michelle K Li, Michelle C Leach, Darshan P Patel, Tung-Chin Hsieh","doi":"10.1177/15579883241260511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Supreme Court ruling <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</i> (June 2022) overturned federal protection of abortion rights, resulting in significant impact on both male and female reproductive rights and health care delivery. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent vasectomy at a single academic institution between June 2021 and June 2023. Our objective was to compare the rates of childless and partnerless vasectomies 1 year before and after this ruling, as these men may be more susceptible to postprocedural regret. Of total, 631 men (median age = 39 years, range = 20-70) underwent vasectomy consultation. Total vasectomies pre- and post-Dobbs were 304 (48%) versus 327 (52%). Total childless and partnerless vasectomies pre- and post-Dobbs were 44 (42%) versus 61 (58%) and 43 (46%) versus 50 (54%). Vasectomy completion rate was slightly increased post-Dobbs (90% vs. 88%; <i>p</i> = .240). The post-Dobbs cohort had significantly less children (1.8 vs. 2.0; <i>p</i> = .031). Men in the post-Dobbs era were significantly more likely to be commercially insured (72% vs. 64%) and less likely to be uninsured (1% vs. 6%; <i>p</i> = .002). Men who underwent childless vasectomy were significantly more likely to be younger (36.4 vs. 39.8 years; <i>p</i> < .001). There was a significantly greater proportion of Hispanic and Black men in the partnerless cohort compared to the cohort with partners (24% vs. 19% and 9% vs. 2%; <i>p</i> = .002). In conclusion, patients should be counseled on the permanent nature of this procedure, underscoring need for effective and reversible male contraception.</p>","PeriodicalId":7429,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Men's Health","volume":"18 3","pages":"15579883241260511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Men's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883241260511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Supreme Court ruling Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (June 2022) overturned federal protection of abortion rights, resulting in significant impact on both male and female reproductive rights and health care delivery. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent vasectomy at a single academic institution between June 2021 and June 2023. Our objective was to compare the rates of childless and partnerless vasectomies 1 year before and after this ruling, as these men may be more susceptible to postprocedural regret. Of total, 631 men (median age = 39 years, range = 20-70) underwent vasectomy consultation. Total vasectomies pre- and post-Dobbs were 304 (48%) versus 327 (52%). Total childless and partnerless vasectomies pre- and post-Dobbs were 44 (42%) versus 61 (58%) and 43 (46%) versus 50 (54%). Vasectomy completion rate was slightly increased post-Dobbs (90% vs. 88%; p = .240). The post-Dobbs cohort had significantly less children (1.8 vs. 2.0; p = .031). Men in the post-Dobbs era were significantly more likely to be commercially insured (72% vs. 64%) and less likely to be uninsured (1% vs. 6%; p = .002). Men who underwent childless vasectomy were significantly more likely to be younger (36.4 vs. 39.8 years; p < .001). There was a significantly greater proportion of Hispanic and Black men in the partnerless cohort compared to the cohort with partners (24% vs. 19% and 9% vs. 2%; p = .002). In conclusion, patients should be counseled on the permanent nature of this procedure, underscoring need for effective and reversible male contraception.

多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案前后无子女和无伴侣输精管切除率的比较。
最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案(2022 年 6 月)的判决推翻了联邦对堕胎权利的保护,对男性和女性的生殖权利及医疗服务产生了重大影响。我们对 2021 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月期间在一家学术机构接受输精管切除术的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。我们的目的是比较该裁决前后一年无子女和无伴侣输精管结扎率,因为这些男性可能更容易在手术后后悔。共有 631 名男性(中位年龄 = 39 岁,范围 = 20-70)接受了输精管切除术咨询。多布斯之前和之后的输精管结扎手术总数分别为 304 例(48%)和 327 例(52%)。多布斯之前和之后的无子女和无伴侣输精管结扎手术总数分别为 44 例(42%)对 61 例(58%)和 43 例(46%)对 50 例(54%)。多布斯之后的输精管结扎完成率略有提高(90% 对 88%;P = .240)。后多布斯时代人群的子女数明显较少(1.8 对 2.0;P = 0.031)。后多布斯时代的男性有商业保险的比例明显更高(72% 对 64%),无保险的比例更低(1% 对 6%;P = .002)。接受无子女输精管切除术的男性明显更年轻(36.4 岁对 39.8 岁;P < .001)。与有伴侣的人群相比,无伴侣人群中西班牙裔和黑人男性的比例明显更高(24% 对 19% 和 9% 对 2%;P = .002)。总之,应告知患者该手术的永久性,强调男性需要采取有效且可逆的避孕措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Men's Health
American Journal of Men's Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
107
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Men"s Health will be a core resource for cutting-edge information regarding men"s health and illness. The Journal will publish papers from all health, behavioral and social disciplines, including but not limited to medicine, nursing, allied health, public health, health psychology/behavioral medicine, and medical sociology and anthropology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信