Opinions of intensive care nurses on continuous renal replacement therapy: A qualitative study.

Gülşen Kılıç, Yasemin Eskigülek, Bülent Erdoğan, Hilal Arpa, Gizem Erbaş, Beyza Baştürk
{"title":"Opinions of intensive care nurses on continuous renal replacement therapy: A qualitative study.","authors":"Gülşen Kılıç, Yasemin Eskigülek, Bülent Erdoğan, Hilal Arpa, Gizem Erbaş, Beyza Baştürk","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.14176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This is a phenomenologically designed qualitative study conducted to explore and conceptualize the problems experienced by intensive care nurses caring for patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, then thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was conducted 12 intensive care nurses. As a result, 3 main and 6 sub-themes were identified. The themes identified were changing routines, uncertainty in terms of patient benefit, and need for adaptation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that nurses experienced challenges in providing care to patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy, spent more effort to prevent complications, and lacked information on the subject. It is recommended to consider institutional and individual actions to meet the educational needs of nurses for implementing continuous renal replacement therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94253,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"886-892"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This is a phenomenologically designed qualitative study conducted to explore and conceptualize the problems experienced by intensive care nurses caring for patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Methods: Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, then thematic analysis was conducted.

Results: The study was conducted 12 intensive care nurses. As a result, 3 main and 6 sub-themes were identified. The themes identified were changing routines, uncertainty in terms of patient benefit, and need for adaptation.

Conclusion: It was found that nurses experienced challenges in providing care to patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy, spent more effort to prevent complications, and lacked information on the subject. It is recommended to consider institutional and individual actions to meet the educational needs of nurses for implementing continuous renal replacement therapy.

重症监护护士对持续肾脏替代疗法的看法:定性研究。
导言:这是一项现象学设计的定性研究,旨在探讨和概念化重症监护护士在护理接受持续肾替代治疗的患者时遇到的问题:这是一项现象学设计的定性研究,旨在探讨重症监护护士在护理接受持续肾脏替代治疗的患者时遇到的问题,并将其概念化:方法:对参与者进行了面对面的半结构化访谈。访谈内容逐字记录,然后进行专题分析:研究对象为 12 名重症监护护士。结果确定了 3 个主主题和 6 个次主题。所确定的主题包括常规的改变、患者利益的不确定性以及适应的需要:研究发现,护士在为接受持续肾脏替代疗法的患者提供护理时面临挑战,需要花费更多精力来预防并发症,并且缺乏相关信息。建议考虑采取机构和个人行动,满足护士在实施持续肾脏替代疗法方面的教育需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信