Carlos A Perez-Heydrich, Ilahi Creary-Miller, Marcus Spann, Yuri Agrawal
{"title":"Remote Delivery of Vestibular Rehabilitation for Vestibular Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Carlos A Perez-Heydrich, Ilahi Creary-Miller, Marcus Spann, Yuri Agrawal","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with vestibular dysfunction encounter many obstacles when seeking vestibular rehabilitation treatment. Remote delivery of vestibular rehabilitation may offer a promising avenue for overcoming these barriers, ensuring uninterrupted and cost-effective care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate clinical trials studying telerehabilitation and virtual reality devices as therapeutic interventions for individuals with vestibular dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and SCOPUS was conducted for randomized controlled trials describing the use of remote care delivery for vestibular rehabilitation. Bias of studies was assessed with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 1,358 unique articles and 14 articles matched the search criteria. Study samples size ranged from 20 to 337, with mean ages ranging from 29.3 to 77.7 years. Interventions included telephone and online communication, exergaming devices, web-based applications, and head-mounted devices to deliver vestibular rehabilitation. Outcomes included validated questionnaires, objective clinical tests, and physical examinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The studies reviewed in this article reported greater or equivalent outcomes when incorporating remote care options as supplements or alternatives to standard care for patients with vestibular dysfunction. Further research is required to address limitations in these studies such as heterogeneity of control groups and cost-effectiveness of these interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: People with vestibular dysfunction encounter many obstacles when seeking vestibular rehabilitation treatment. Remote delivery of vestibular rehabilitation may offer a promising avenue for overcoming these barriers, ensuring uninterrupted and cost-effective care.
Objective: To evaluate clinical trials studying telerehabilitation and virtual reality devices as therapeutic interventions for individuals with vestibular dysfunction.
Methods: A PRISMA systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and SCOPUS was conducted for randomized controlled trials describing the use of remote care delivery for vestibular rehabilitation. Bias of studies was assessed with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2).
Results: The search identified 1,358 unique articles and 14 articles matched the search criteria. Study samples size ranged from 20 to 337, with mean ages ranging from 29.3 to 77.7 years. Interventions included telephone and online communication, exergaming devices, web-based applications, and head-mounted devices to deliver vestibular rehabilitation. Outcomes included validated questionnaires, objective clinical tests, and physical examinations.
Conclusions: The studies reviewed in this article reported greater or equivalent outcomes when incorporating remote care options as supplements or alternatives to standard care for patients with vestibular dysfunction. Further research is required to address limitations in these studies such as heterogeneity of control groups and cost-effectiveness of these interventions.
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.