Losartan May Not Prevent Vestibular Schwannoma Growth or Related Hearing Loss During Observation.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Benjamin D Lovin, Marc-Elie Nader, Yun Qing, Mike Hernandez, Shaan Raza, Franco DeMonte, Paul W Gidley
{"title":"Losartan May Not Prevent Vestibular Schwannoma Growth or Related Hearing Loss During Observation.","authors":"Benjamin D Lovin, Marc-Elie Nader, Yun Qing, Mike Hernandez, Shaan Raza, Franco DeMonte, Paul W Gidley","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of losartan on vestibular schwannoma (VS) growth and related hearing loss during observation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Sporadic VS patients undergoing initial observation with at least two magnetic resonance imaging and audiologic examinations.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Losartan.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Endpoints included VS growth, quantitative audiologic changes, survival free of tumor growth, and survival free of nonserviceable hearing. Patient characteristics and endpoints were compared by losartan use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine patients were included, of which 33% were taking losartan. Tumor growth was observed in 50% of patients in the losartan group and 36% in the non-losartan group (p = 0.329). Survival analysis failed to show a significant difference in the hazard rate of VS growth between groups (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-2.70; p = 0.346). Throughout observation, mean decreases in normalized pure-tone average were 5.5 and 9.3 dB in the losartan and non-losartan groups, respectively (p = 0.908). Mean decreases in normalized word recognition score were 11.0 and 16.6% in the losartan and non-losartan groups, respectively (p = 0.757). Nonserviceable hearing developed in 19% of patients in the losartan group and 28% in the non-losartan group (p = 0.734). Survival analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in the hazard rate of developing nonserviceable hearing between groups (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-5.21; p = 0.337).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Losartan use may not reduce the risk of VS growth or hearing loss during observation. A randomized trial would be ideal to further identify the true effect on growth and hearing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of losartan on vestibular schwannoma (VS) growth and related hearing loss during observation.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: Sporadic VS patients undergoing initial observation with at least two magnetic resonance imaging and audiologic examinations.

Intervention: Losartan.

Main outcome measures: Endpoints included VS growth, quantitative audiologic changes, survival free of tumor growth, and survival free of nonserviceable hearing. Patient characteristics and endpoints were compared by losartan use.

Results: Seventy-nine patients were included, of which 33% were taking losartan. Tumor growth was observed in 50% of patients in the losartan group and 36% in the non-losartan group (p = 0.329). Survival analysis failed to show a significant difference in the hazard rate of VS growth between groups (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-2.70; p = 0.346). Throughout observation, mean decreases in normalized pure-tone average were 5.5 and 9.3 dB in the losartan and non-losartan groups, respectively (p = 0.908). Mean decreases in normalized word recognition score were 11.0 and 16.6% in the losartan and non-losartan groups, respectively (p = 0.757). Nonserviceable hearing developed in 19% of patients in the losartan group and 28% in the non-losartan group (p = 0.734). Survival analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in the hazard rate of developing nonserviceable hearing between groups (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-5.21; p = 0.337).

Conclusions: Losartan use may not reduce the risk of VS growth or hearing loss during observation. A randomized trial would be ideal to further identify the true effect on growth and hearing.

洛沙坦在观察期间可能无法预防前庭许旺瘤的生长或相关听力损失。
研究目的评估洛沙坦在观察期间对前庭分裂瘤(VS)生长和相关听力损失的影响:研究设计:回顾性队列研究:地点:三级转诊中心:干预措施:洛沙坦:干预措施:洛沙坦:终点包括VS生长、听力定量变化、肿瘤不再生长的存活率以及听力不再受损的存活率。根据使用洛沙坦的情况对患者特征和终点进行比较:共纳入 79 例患者,其中 33% 正在服用洛沙坦。在洛沙坦组和非洛沙坦组中,分别有50%和36%的患者观察到肿瘤生长(P = 0.329)。生存期分析未显示出不同组间 VS 增长危险率的显著差异(危险比为 1.38;95% 置信区间为 0.70-2.70;P = 0.346)。在整个观察过程中,洛沙坦组和非洛沙坦组的归一化纯音平均值分别下降了 5.5 和 9.3 dB(p = 0.908)。洛沙坦组和非洛沙坦组的正常化单词识别得分平均降幅分别为 11.0% 和 16.6%(p = 0.757)。洛沙坦组和非洛沙坦组分别有 19% 和 28% 的患者出现听力丧失(p = 0.734)。生存分析表明,不同组别之间发生非永久性听力的危险率没有显著差异(危险比,1.71;95% 置信区间,0.56-5.21;p = 0.337):结论:在观察期间使用洛沙坦可能不会降低VS增长或听力损失的风险。结论:在观察期间使用洛沙坦可能不会降低 VS 生长或听力损失的风险,理想的做法是进行随机试验,以进一步确定对生长和听力的真正影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信