LA CROSSE VIRUS VECTOR RESTING BEHAVIORS - FIELD STUDIES WITH PROKOPAK AND RESTING SHELTER COLLECTIONS PROVIDE LOW YIELD.

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Mary Nordgulen, Kaylin Lewandowski, Nathan Burkett-Cadena, Derrick Mathias, Brian D Byrd
{"title":"LA CROSSE VIRUS VECTOR RESTING BEHAVIORS - FIELD STUDIES WITH PROKOPAK AND RESTING SHELTER COLLECTIONS PROVIDE LOW YIELD.","authors":"Mary Nordgulen, Kaylin Lewandowski, Nathan Burkett-Cadena, Derrick Mathias, Brian D Byrd","doi":"10.2987/23-7161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resting adult mosquito collections provide opportunities to sample broad physiological conditions (e.g., blood-engorged, gravid, nectar-engorged, and/or parous) that yield important biological information necessary to understand vector and pathogen transmission ecology. In this study, we evaluated Prokopak aspirations of Rhododendron spp. and human-powered pop-up resting shelter collections at 4 residences with historical evidence of proximal La Crosse virus (LACV) transmission from May through September 2022. The goal of this study was to investigate these sampling methods in the context of LACV vector biology-focused principally on Aedes triseriatus (primary LACV vector) and 2 invasive species (Ae. albopictus and Ae. japonicus) that likely serve as secondary LACV vectors. Overall, 304 resting shelters and 80 Prokopak collections yielded a grand total of 33 mosquitoes, of which a third were LACV vectors (Ae. triseriatus [n = 1, 3.0%], Ae. albopictus [n = 4, 12.1%], and Ae. japonicus [n = 6, 18.2%]). Anopheles punctipennis (n = 9, 27.2%) was the most frequently collected species followed by Culex erraticus (n = 7, 21.2%), whereas the least frequently collected species were Ae. triseriatus and Cx. pipiens (n = 1, 3.0%). Despite substantial collection efforts, and concurrent gravid-trap evidence of LACV vectors at the collection sites, Prokopak aspiration of Rhododendron spp. and human-powered pop-up resting shelters did not yield a meaningful number of LACV vectors and thus, as described within, may not be useful adjuncts for the evaluation of LACV ecology and disease risk. Additional approaches to evaluate the resting behavior of these vectors in LACV endemic areas are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2987/23-7161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resting adult mosquito collections provide opportunities to sample broad physiological conditions (e.g., blood-engorged, gravid, nectar-engorged, and/or parous) that yield important biological information necessary to understand vector and pathogen transmission ecology. In this study, we evaluated Prokopak aspirations of Rhododendron spp. and human-powered pop-up resting shelter collections at 4 residences with historical evidence of proximal La Crosse virus (LACV) transmission from May through September 2022. The goal of this study was to investigate these sampling methods in the context of LACV vector biology-focused principally on Aedes triseriatus (primary LACV vector) and 2 invasive species (Ae. albopictus and Ae. japonicus) that likely serve as secondary LACV vectors. Overall, 304 resting shelters and 80 Prokopak collections yielded a grand total of 33 mosquitoes, of which a third were LACV vectors (Ae. triseriatus [n = 1, 3.0%], Ae. albopictus [n = 4, 12.1%], and Ae. japonicus [n = 6, 18.2%]). Anopheles punctipennis (n = 9, 27.2%) was the most frequently collected species followed by Culex erraticus (n = 7, 21.2%), whereas the least frequently collected species were Ae. triseriatus and Cx. pipiens (n = 1, 3.0%). Despite substantial collection efforts, and concurrent gravid-trap evidence of LACV vectors at the collection sites, Prokopak aspiration of Rhododendron spp. and human-powered pop-up resting shelters did not yield a meaningful number of LACV vectors and thus, as described within, may not be useful adjuncts for the evaluation of LACV ecology and disease risk. Additional approaches to evaluate the resting behavior of these vectors in LACV endemic areas are needed.

拉克罗斯病毒病媒的休眠行为--使用 Prokopak 和休眠庇护所采集物进行的实地研究收效甚微。
采集静止的成蚊可提供广泛的生理条件样本(如吸血、怀孕、吸蜜和/或副产卵),从而获得了解病媒和病原体传播生态学所需的重要生物信息。在本研究中,我们评估了从 2022 年 5 月到 9 月期间在 4 处有拉克罗斯病毒 (LACV) 近端传播历史证据的住宅中对杜鹃花属植物的 Prokopak 抽吸和人力弹出式休息庇护所收集情况。本研究的目标是在 LACV 病媒生物学背景下研究这些采样方法,主要侧重于三带伊蚊(LACV 主要病媒)和两种可能作为 LACV 次要病媒的入侵物种(白纹伊蚊和日本伊蚊)。总体而言,304 个休息庇护所和 80 个 Prokopak 采集器共采集到 33 只蚊子,其中三分之一是 LACV 病媒(三喙疟蚊 [n = 1,3.0%]、白喙疟蚊 [n = 4,12.1%] 和日本疟蚊 [n = 6,18.2%])。点状按蚊(n = 9,27.2%)是采集频率最高的物种,其次是厄尔库蚊(n = 7,21.2%),而采集频率最低的物种是三带喙库蚊(Ae. triseriatus)和喙库蚊(Cx. pipiens)(n = 1,3.0%)。尽管进行了大量的采集工作,并同时在采集地点发现了 LACV 向量的雌性诱捕器证据,但杜鹃花属植物的 Prokopak 抽吸法和人力弹出式休息庇护所并没有产生有意义的 LACV 向量数量,因此,如前所述,可能不是评估 LACV 生态学和疾病风险的有用辅助手段。我们需要更多的方法来评估这些病媒在 LACV 流行地区的休息行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association (JAMCA) encourages the submission of previously unpublished manuscripts contributing to the advancement of knowledge of mosquitoes and other arthropod vectors. The Journal encourages submission of a wide range of scientific studies that include all aspects of biology, ecology, systematics, and integrated pest management. Manuscripts exceeding normal length (e. g., monographs) may be accepted for publication as a supplement to the regular issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信