Disaggregation of canopy photosynthesis among tree species in a mixed broadleaf forest.

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Marko Stojanović, Georg Jocher, Natalia Kowalska, Justyna Szatniewska, Ina Zavadilová, Otmar Urban, Josef Čáslavský, Petr Horáček, Manuel Acosta, Marian Pavelka, John D Marshall
{"title":"Disaggregation of canopy photosynthesis among tree species in a mixed broadleaf forest.","authors":"Marko Stojanović, Georg Jocher, Natalia Kowalska, Justyna Szatniewska, Ina Zavadilová, Otmar Urban, Josef Čáslavský, Petr Horáček, Manuel Acosta, Marian Pavelka, John D Marshall","doi":"10.1093/treephys/tpae064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbon dioxide sequestration from the atmosphere is commonly assessed using the eddy covariance method. Its net flux signal can be decomposed into gross primary production and ecosystem respiration components, but these have seldom been tested against independent methods. In addition, eddy covariance lacks the ability to partition carbon sequestration among individual trees or species within mixed forests. Therefore, we compared gross primary production from eddy covariance versus an independent method based on sap flow and water-use efficiency, as measured by the tissue heat balance method and δ13C of phloem contents, respectively. The latter measurements were conducted on individual trees throughout a growing season in a mixed broadleaf forest dominated by three tree species, namely English oak, narrow-leaved ash and common hornbeam (Quercus robur L., Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl, and Carpinus betulus L., respectively). In this context, we applied an alternative ecophysiological method aimed at verifying the accuracy of a state-of-the-art eddy covariance system while also offering a solution to the partitioning problem. We observed strong agreement in the ecosystem gross primary production estimates (R2 = 0.56; P < 0.0001), with correlation being especially high and nearly on the 1:1 line in the period before the end of July (R2 = 0.85; P < 0.0001). After this period, the estimates of gross primary production began to diverge. Possible reasons for the divergence are discussed, focusing especially on phenology and the limitation of the isotopic data. English oak showed the highest per-tree daily photosynthetic rates among tree species, but the smaller, more abundant common hornbeam contributed most to the stand-level summation, especially early in the spring. These findings provide a rigorous test of the methods and the species-level photosynthesis offers avenues for enhancing forest management aimed at carbon sequestration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23286,"journal":{"name":"Tree physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11240116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpae064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon dioxide sequestration from the atmosphere is commonly assessed using the eddy covariance method. Its net flux signal can be decomposed into gross primary production and ecosystem respiration components, but these have seldom been tested against independent methods. In addition, eddy covariance lacks the ability to partition carbon sequestration among individual trees or species within mixed forests. Therefore, we compared gross primary production from eddy covariance versus an independent method based on sap flow and water-use efficiency, as measured by the tissue heat balance method and δ13C of phloem contents, respectively. The latter measurements were conducted on individual trees throughout a growing season in a mixed broadleaf forest dominated by three tree species, namely English oak, narrow-leaved ash and common hornbeam (Quercus robur L., Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl, and Carpinus betulus L., respectively). In this context, we applied an alternative ecophysiological method aimed at verifying the accuracy of a state-of-the-art eddy covariance system while also offering a solution to the partitioning problem. We observed strong agreement in the ecosystem gross primary production estimates (R2 = 0.56; P < 0.0001), with correlation being especially high and nearly on the 1:1 line in the period before the end of July (R2 = 0.85; P < 0.0001). After this period, the estimates of gross primary production began to diverge. Possible reasons for the divergence are discussed, focusing especially on phenology and the limitation of the isotopic data. English oak showed the highest per-tree daily photosynthetic rates among tree species, but the smaller, more abundant common hornbeam contributed most to the stand-level summation, especially early in the spring. These findings provide a rigorous test of the methods and the species-level photosynthesis offers avenues for enhancing forest management aimed at carbon sequestration.

阔叶混交林树种之间树冠光合作用的分解。
通常使用涡度协方差(EC)方法来评估大气中二氧化碳的螯合作用。其净通量信号可分解为总初级生产量(GPP)和生态系统呼吸作用成分,但这些成分很少经过独立方法的测试。此外,EC 也无法在混交林内的单个树木或物种之间分配碳固存。因此,我们将 EC 得出的 GPP 与基于液流和水利用效率的独立方法进行了比较,前者是通过组织热平衡法测量的,后者是通过韧皮部含量的 δ13C 测量的。后一种测量方法是在以英国栎、狭叶白蜡和普通角闪树这三种树种为主的阔叶混交林中,在整个生长季节对单棵树木进行的。在这种情况下,我们采用了另一种生态生理学方法,旨在验证最先进的 EC 系统的准确性,同时为分区问题提供一种解决方案。我们观察到生态系统 GPP 估计值具有很强的一致性(R2 = 0.56;p < 0.0001),在七月底之前(即 DOY 212;R2 = 0.85;p < 0.0001),相关性特别高,几乎达到 1:1 线。这一时期之后,对 GPP 的估计开始出现分歧。本文讨论了出现分歧的可能原因,特别是物候学和同位素数据的局限性。在所有树种中,英国栎的单树日光合速率最高,但更小、更多的普通角闪树对林分级总和的贡献最大,尤其是在早春。这些发现对研究方法进行了严格的检验,物种级光合作用为加强森林管理以实现碳固存提供了途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tree physiology
Tree physiology 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.50%
发文量
133
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Tree Physiology promotes research in a framework of hierarchically organized systems, measuring insight by the ability to link adjacent layers: thus, investigated tree physiology phenomenon should seek mechanistic explanation in finer-scale phenomena as well as seek significance in larger scale phenomena (Passioura 1979). A phenomenon not linked downscale is merely descriptive; an observation not linked upscale, might be trivial. Physiologists often refer qualitatively to processes at finer or coarser scale than the scale of their observation, and studies formally directed at three, or even two adjacent scales are rare. To emphasize the importance of relating mechanisms to coarser scale function, Tree Physiology will highlight papers doing so particularly well as feature papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信