Ipsilateral Supracondylar and Medial Epicondyle Humerus Fractures in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Incidence, Epidemiology, Treatment, and Outcomes.

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002741
Jessica McGraw-Heinrich, Jason Zarahi Amaral, Elizabeth Williams, Rebecca Schultz, Scott Rosenfeld
{"title":"Ipsilateral Supracondylar and Medial Epicondyle Humerus Fractures in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Incidence, Epidemiology, Treatment, and Outcomes.","authors":"Jessica McGraw-Heinrich, Jason Zarahi Amaral, Elizabeth Williams, Rebecca Schultz, Scott Rosenfeld","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH; AO/OTA13-M/3.1) and medial epicondyle fractures (AO/OTA13u-M/7.1) are common. Concomitant SCH with ipsilateral medial epicondyle fractures remain scarcely reported. We investigated the epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of this rare, combined injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of pediatric patients with concomitant SCH and medial epicondyle fractures at a level 1 hospital from 2010 to 2020 was performed. Patient data, treatments, and outcomes were assessed. Radiographs were reviewed for fracture classification and alignment. Patients aged above 18 years and those with inaccessible imaging were excluded. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3344 patients undergoing surgery for SCH fractures, 14 (6 females, mean: 10.59 y) with concomitant SCH and medial epicondyle fractures were included. Overall, 28.6% of patients exhibited preoperative nerve palsies (3 PIN, 1 median nerve). There was 1 flexion type and 13 Gartland type III SCH fractures. Medial epicondyle fracture displacement averaged 4.13 mm (range: 2 to 7 mm). Thirteen medial epicondyle fractures occurred medial to the physis with 1 through the physis. Eight patients (57.1%) had medial fixation-7 medial pins, 1 medial screw-which captured both the medial epicondyle and medial column of the SCH fracture. Six medial epicondyles were treated closed. The average time to pin pull was 33.1 days (range: 27 to 51 d) with average follow-up of 138.6 days (range: 27 to 574 d). Overall, 50% of patients completed physical therapy (PT). Complications occurred in 4 cases: prominence of a medial pin, 1 patient required additional PT and dynamic splinting for loss of functional extension, 1 patient underwent a manipulation under anesthesia 3.5 months postoperatively for flexion contracture, and 1 patient developed medial epicondyle nonunion and SCH malunion that underwent corrective osteotomy 10.5 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concurrent SCH and medial epicondyle fractures exhibited a high rate of nerve palsy (28.6%) and complications (28.6%) and were frequently referred to physical therapy. While patients treated without medial fixation went on to union, this combined injury might represent a relative indication for medial pinning of the SCH fracture. Further studies on this rare injury pattern are needed to determine optimal treatment methods.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV-therapeutic.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH; AO/OTA13-M/3.1) and medial epicondyle fractures (AO/OTA13u-M/7.1) are common. Concomitant SCH with ipsilateral medial epicondyle fractures remain scarcely reported. We investigated the epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of this rare, combined injury.

Methods: A retrospective review of pediatric patients with concomitant SCH and medial epicondyle fractures at a level 1 hospital from 2010 to 2020 was performed. Patient data, treatments, and outcomes were assessed. Radiographs were reviewed for fracture classification and alignment. Patients aged above 18 years and those with inaccessible imaging were excluded. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results: Of 3344 patients undergoing surgery for SCH fractures, 14 (6 females, mean: 10.59 y) with concomitant SCH and medial epicondyle fractures were included. Overall, 28.6% of patients exhibited preoperative nerve palsies (3 PIN, 1 median nerve). There was 1 flexion type and 13 Gartland type III SCH fractures. Medial epicondyle fracture displacement averaged 4.13 mm (range: 2 to 7 mm). Thirteen medial epicondyle fractures occurred medial to the physis with 1 through the physis. Eight patients (57.1%) had medial fixation-7 medial pins, 1 medial screw-which captured both the medial epicondyle and medial column of the SCH fracture. Six medial epicondyles were treated closed. The average time to pin pull was 33.1 days (range: 27 to 51 d) with average follow-up of 138.6 days (range: 27 to 574 d). Overall, 50% of patients completed physical therapy (PT). Complications occurred in 4 cases: prominence of a medial pin, 1 patient required additional PT and dynamic splinting for loss of functional extension, 1 patient underwent a manipulation under anesthesia 3.5 months postoperatively for flexion contracture, and 1 patient developed medial epicondyle nonunion and SCH malunion that underwent corrective osteotomy 10.5 months postoperatively.

Conclusions: Concurrent SCH and medial epicondyle fractures exhibited a high rate of nerve palsy (28.6%) and complications (28.6%) and were frequently referred to physical therapy. While patients treated without medial fixation went on to union, this combined injury might represent a relative indication for medial pinning of the SCH fracture. Further studies on this rare injury pattern are needed to determine optimal treatment methods.

Level of evidence: Level IV-therapeutic.

小儿患者的同侧肱骨髁上和肱骨内上髁骨折:对发病率、流行病学、治疗和结果的回顾性分析。
背景:小儿肱骨髁上骨折(SCH;AO/OTA13-M/3.1)和内上髁骨折(AO/OTA13u-M/7.1)很常见。伴有同侧内上髁骨折的肱骨髁上骨折(SCH)仍鲜有报道。我们对这种罕见的合并损伤的流行病学、治疗和结果进行了调查:我们对一家一级医院 2010 年至 2020 年期间并发 SCH 和内侧上髁骨折的儿科患者进行了回顾性研究。对患者数据、治疗方法和结果进行了评估。对X光片进行复查,以确定骨折分类和对位。排除了年龄超过18岁和无法获得影像学资料的患者。进行了描述性统计:在3344名接受SCH骨折手术的患者中,有14名(6名女性,平均年龄:10.59岁)同时患有SCH和内上髁骨折。总体而言,28.6%的患者在术前出现神经麻痹(3例PIN,1例正中神经)。有1例屈曲型和13例Gartland III型SCH骨折。内上髁骨折移位平均为4.13毫米(范围:2至7毫米)。13例内侧上髁骨折发生在椎体内侧,1例贯穿椎体。8名患者(57.1%)进行了内侧固定,其中7人使用了内侧钢针,1人使用了内侧螺钉,这些钢针和螺钉同时固定了SCH骨折的内侧上髁和内侧柱。6例内侧上髁进行了闭合治疗。平均拔针时间为33.1天(范围:27至51天),平均随访时间为138.6天(范围:27至574天)。总体而言,50%的患者完成了物理治疗(PT)。4例患者出现并发症:内侧针突出;1例患者因丧失功能性伸展而需要额外的物理治疗和动态夹板治疗;1例患者因屈曲挛缩而在术后3.5个月在麻醉下接受了手法治疗;1例患者出现内侧上髁骨不连和SCH骨错位,术后10.5个月接受了矫正截骨术:并发SCH和内上髁骨折的神经麻痹率(28.6%)和并发症发生率(28.6%)都很高,而且经常需要接受物理治疗。虽然未接受内侧固定治疗的患者最终都获得了愈合,但这种合并损伤可能是SCH骨折内侧固定的相对适应症。需要进一步研究这种罕见的损伤模式,以确定最佳治疗方法:证据等级:IV级-治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信