Comparison of Different Take-off Thresholds When Assessing Vertical Jump Performance.

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-05-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Jason C Smith, Hugh S Lamont, Madeleine Barefoot
{"title":"Comparison of Different Take-off Thresholds When Assessing Vertical Jump Performance.","authors":"Jason C Smith, Hugh S Lamont, Madeleine Barefoot","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reliably determining vertical jump (VJ) take-off on a force plate is crucial when identifying performance-related biomechanical factors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare several take-off thresholds (20 N, 10 N, 5 N, 1 N, five standard deviations above an unloaded force plate (5SD), and peak residual force (PkRes) produced when the force plate was unloaded) in terms of jump height (JH), movement time (MT), reactive strength index modified (RSImod), net impulse (netIMP), and propulsive impulse (prIMP). Twenty-one participants performed five countermovement VJs on a force plate. All thresholds were reliable with intraclass correlations ≥ 0.835 and coefficient of variation < 10%. Our results show significant differences across the different take-off thresholds for JH, MT, RSImod, netIMP, and prIMP. However, these differences were considered trivial based on effect sizes. While differences in these thresholds may not be practically meaningful, practitioners are encouraged to consider the noise in the force-time signal and select an appropriate threshold that matches PkRes within their given environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 1","pages":"660-668"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliably determining vertical jump (VJ) take-off on a force plate is crucial when identifying performance-related biomechanical factors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare several take-off thresholds (20 N, 10 N, 5 N, 1 N, five standard deviations above an unloaded force plate (5SD), and peak residual force (PkRes) produced when the force plate was unloaded) in terms of jump height (JH), movement time (MT), reactive strength index modified (RSImod), net impulse (netIMP), and propulsive impulse (prIMP). Twenty-one participants performed five countermovement VJs on a force plate. All thresholds were reliable with intraclass correlations ≥ 0.835 and coefficient of variation < 10%. Our results show significant differences across the different take-off thresholds for JH, MT, RSImod, netIMP, and prIMP. However, these differences were considered trivial based on effect sizes. While differences in these thresholds may not be practically meaningful, practitioners are encouraged to consider the noise in the force-time signal and select an appropriate threshold that matches PkRes within their given environment.

评估立定跳远成绩时不同起飞阈值的比较
在确定与成绩相关的生物力学因素时,可靠地确定在测力板上垂直起跳(VJ)的腾空至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是从起跳高度(JH)、运动时间(MT)、修正的反应力量指数(RSImod)、净冲量(netIMP)和推进冲量(prIMP)等方面比较几种起跳阈值(20 N、10 N、5 N、1 N、高于无负荷力板五个标准差(5SD)和力板无负荷时产生的残余力峰值(PkRes))。21 名参与者在测力板上进行了五次反向运动 VJ。所有阈值均可靠,类内相关系数≥ 0.835,变异系数小于 10%。我们的结果显示,JH、MT、RSImod、netIMP 和 prIMP 的不同起飞阈值之间存在显著差异。然而,根据效应大小,这些差异被认为是微不足道的。虽然这些阈值之间的差异可能没有实际意义,但我们鼓励从业人员考虑力-时间信号中的噪声,并选择一个合适的阈值,使其与特定环境中的 PkRes 相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信