Contingency Management for Drug Use Disorders: Meta-Analysis and Application of Tolin's Criteria.

IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Clinical Psychology-science and Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-10 DOI:10.1037/cps0000121
Rory A Pfund, Meredith K Ginley, Cassandra L Boness, Carla J Rash, Kristyn Zajac, Katie Witkiewitz
{"title":"Contingency Management for Drug Use Disorders: Meta-Analysis and Application of Tolin's Criteria.","authors":"Rory A Pfund, Meredith K Ginley, Cassandra L Boness, Carla J Rash, Kristyn Zajac, Katie Witkiewitz","doi":"10.1037/cps0000121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several professional organizations and federal agencies recommend contingency management (CM) as an empirically supported treatment for drug use disorder. However, the release of the \"Tolin criteria\" warrants an updated recommendation. Using this methodology, five meta-analyses (84 studies, 11,000 participants) were reviewed. Two meta-analyses were rated moderate quality, and three were rated low or critically low quality. Comparator conditions included active treatment, placebo, treatment as usual, and no treatment. The primary outcome was abstinence. Considering only the moderate quality meta-analyses, the effect of CM versus control on posttreatment abstinence was <i>d</i> = 0.54 [0.43, 0.64] and follow-up abstinence was <i>d</i>=0.08 [0.00, 0.16]. A \"strong\" recommendation was provided for CM as an empirically supported treatment for drug use disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":10434,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","volume":"31 2","pages":"136-150"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several professional organizations and federal agencies recommend contingency management (CM) as an empirically supported treatment for drug use disorder. However, the release of the "Tolin criteria" warrants an updated recommendation. Using this methodology, five meta-analyses (84 studies, 11,000 participants) were reviewed. Two meta-analyses were rated moderate quality, and three were rated low or critically low quality. Comparator conditions included active treatment, placebo, treatment as usual, and no treatment. The primary outcome was abstinence. Considering only the moderate quality meta-analyses, the effect of CM versus control on posttreatment abstinence was d = 0.54 [0.43, 0.64] and follow-up abstinence was d=0.08 [0.00, 0.16]. A "strong" recommendation was provided for CM as an empirically supported treatment for drug use disorder.

药物使用障碍的应急管理:托林标准的 Meta 分析与应用》(Meta-Analysis and Application of Tolin's Criteria)。
一些专业组织和联邦机构推荐将应急管理(CM)作为治疗吸毒障碍的一种经验支持疗法。然而,"托林标准 "的发布需要更新推荐。利用这种方法,我们对五项荟萃分析(84 项研究,11,000 名参与者)进行了审查。其中两项荟萃分析被评为中等质量,三项被评为低质量或极低质量。比较条件包括积极治疗、安慰剂、常规治疗和不治疗。主要结果是戒断。仅考虑中等质量的荟萃分析,CM 与对照组相比对治疗后戒断的影响为 d=0.54 [0.43, 0.64],后续戒断为 d=0.08 [0.00, 0.16]。该研究提出了 "强烈 "建议,认为CM是一种得到经验支持的吸毒障碍治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice presents cutting-edge developments in the science and practice of clinical psychology and related mental health fields by publishing scholarly articles, primarily involving narrative and systematic reviews as well as meta-analyses related to assessment, intervention, and service delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信