Religiosity, Financial Risk Taking, and Reward Processing: An Experimental Study.

IF 2.4 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Journal of Gambling Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1007/s10899-024-10324-4

Frederique J Vanheusden, Sundara Kashyap Vadapalli, Mamunur Rashid, Mark D Griffiths, Amee Kim

{"title":"Religiosity, Financial Risk Taking, and Reward Processing: An Experimental Study.","authors":"Frederique J Vanheusden, Sundara Kashyap Vadapalli, Mamunur Rashid, Mark D Griffiths, Amee Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10899-024-10324-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigated the extent to which financial risk-taking (FRT) perspectives and religiosity influenced an individual's performance on financial decision-making tasks under risk and/or uncertainty. It further investigated the potential to measure this interaction using electro-encephalogram (EEG) assessments through reward-related event-related potentials (P3 and FRN). EEG data were collected from 37 participants undergoing four decision-making tasks comprising the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), Iowa Gambling Test (IGT), Mixed-Gamble Loss-Aversion Task (MGLAT), and MGLA-Success Task (MGLAST). The present study found that BART performance may be affected by an interaction of FRT perspectives and religiosity. The physiological effects of task feedback were also distinguished between religious and non-religious individuals objectively with EEG data. Overall, while religiosity and FRT may not significantly influence IGT and MGLA performance, and interact with BART in a complex way, physiological reaction towards feedback after BART performance appears to be strongly affected by religiosity and FRT perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":48155,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gambling Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gambling Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-024-10324-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigated the extent to which financial risk-taking (FRT) perspectives and religiosity influenced an individual's performance on financial decision-making tasks under risk and/or uncertainty. It further investigated the potential to measure this interaction using electro-encephalogram (EEG) assessments through reward-related event-related potentials (P3 and FRN). EEG data were collected from 37 participants undergoing four decision-making tasks comprising the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), Iowa Gambling Test (IGT), Mixed-Gamble Loss-Aversion Task (MGLAT), and MGLA-Success Task (MGLAST). The present study found that BART performance may be affected by an interaction of FRT perspectives and religiosity. The physiological effects of task feedback were also distinguished between religious and non-religious individuals objectively with EEG data. Overall, while religiosity and FRT may not significantly influence IGT and MGLA performance, and interact with BART in a complex way, physiological reaction towards feedback after BART performance appears to be strongly affected by religiosity and FRT perspectives.

查看原文本刊更多论文

宗教信仰、金融风险承担和回报处理：一项实验研究

本研究调查了在风险和/或不确定性条件下，金融风险承担（FRT）观点和宗教信仰对个人金融决策任务表现的影响程度。研究还进一步探讨了通过脑电图（EEG）评估与奖赏相关的事件相关电位（P3 和 FRN）来衡量这种相互作用的可能性。本研究收集了 37 名参与者的脑电图数据，他们分别接受了气球模拟风险任务（BART）、爱荷华赌博测试（IGT）、混合赌博损失厌恶任务（MGLAT）和 MGLA 成功任务（MGLAST）等四项决策任务。本研究发现，BART 的表现可能会受到 FRT 观点和宗教信仰的交互影响。任务反馈的生理效应也通过脑电图数据客观地区分了有宗教信仰和无宗教信仰的个体。总之，虽然宗教信仰和 FRT 可能不会对 IGT 和 MGLA 的表现产生重大影响，而且会以复杂的方式与 BART 相互影响，但 BART 表现后对反馈的生理反应似乎会受到宗教信仰和 FRT 观点的强烈影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Gambling Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Gambling Studies is an interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination on the many aspects of gambling behavior, both controlled and pathological, as well as variety of problems attendant to, or resultant from, gambling behavior including alcoholism, suicide, crime, and a number of other mental health problems. Articles published in this journal are representative of a cross-section of disciplines including psychiatry, psychology, sociology, political science, criminology, and social work.