Evaluation of macular integrity, after retinal detachment surgery, using MAIA microperimetry

A.J. Rallo-López , R. Martínez-Costa , A. Llovet-Rausell
{"title":"Evaluation of macular integrity, after retinal detachment surgery, using MAIA microperimetry","authors":"A.J. Rallo-López ,&nbsp;R. Martínez-Costa ,&nbsp;A. Llovet-Rausell","doi":"10.1016/j.oftale.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>To describe visual function, macular integrity, and fixation stability using MAIA microperimetry (macular integrity assessment) after retinal detachment surgery. Evaluate if there are statistically significant differences between surgical approaches.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A prospective, comparative, interventional study was conducted, recruiting a total of 21 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and macula-off. Eleven patients underwent surgery using pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), and 10 patients underwent scleral buckle surgery. Clinical examinations and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed post-surgery. MAIA microperimetry was conducted at 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the number of letters read improved over time in the operated eye but did not reach the level of the control eye (p = 0.001). No significant differences were found between the two surgical approaches in BCVA (p = 0.230) or the number of letters read (p = 0.608). Macular integrity in the operated eye did not match that of the control eye in both procedures (p = 0.05). No differences were detected between the two surgeries, either in macular integrity (p = 0.512) or fixation stability (p = 0.835).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Following retinal detachment surgery, a decrease in BCVA and the number of letters read occurs, which does not reach the level of the control eye. No significant differences were observed between the two surgical approaches. Macular integrity in the operated eye does not match that of the control eye.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93886,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia","volume":"99 7","pages":"Pages 281-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173579424001014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

To describe visual function, macular integrity, and fixation stability using MAIA microperimetry (macular integrity assessment) after retinal detachment surgery. Evaluate if there are statistically significant differences between surgical approaches.

Materials and methods

A prospective, comparative, interventional study was conducted, recruiting a total of 21 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and macula-off. Eleven patients underwent surgery using pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), and 10 patients underwent scleral buckle surgery. Clinical examinations and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed post-surgery. MAIA microperimetry was conducted at 6 months.

Results

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the number of letters read improved over time in the operated eye but did not reach the level of the control eye (p = 0.001). No significant differences were found between the two surgical approaches in BCVA (p = 0.230) or the number of letters read (p = 0.608). Macular integrity in the operated eye did not match that of the control eye in both procedures (p = 0.05). No differences were detected between the two surgeries, either in macular integrity (p = 0.512) or fixation stability (p = 0.835).

Conclusions

Following retinal detachment surgery, a decrease in BCVA and the number of letters read occurs, which does not reach the level of the control eye. No significant differences were observed between the two surgical approaches. Macular integrity in the operated eye does not match that of the control eye.

使用 MAIA 显微视力计评估视网膜脱离手术后黄斑的完整性。
背景和目的使用 MAIA 显微视力计(黄斑完整性评估)描述视网膜脱离手术后的视觉功能、黄斑完整性和固定稳定性。评估不同手术方法之间是否存在统计学意义上的显著差异:进行了一项前瞻性、比较性、介入性研究,共招募了 21 名流变性视网膜脱离和黄斑脱落患者。11名患者接受了玻璃体旁切除术(PPV),10名患者接受了巩膜扣带手术。手术后进行了临床检查和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)。6 个月后进行 MAIA 显微视力测定:结果:随着时间的推移,手术眼的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和阅读字母数有所提高,但未达到对照眼的水平(P = 0.001)。两种手术方法在 BCVA(p = 0.230)或读取字母数(p = 0.608)方面无明显差异。在两种手术方法中,手术眼的黄斑完整性与对照眼不一致(p = 0.05)。两种手术在黄斑完整性(p = 0.512)或固定稳定性(p = 0.835)方面均未发现差异:结论:视网膜脱离手术后,BCVA 和阅读字母数都会下降,但不会达到对照眼的水平。两种手术方法之间无明显差异。手术眼的黄斑完整性与对照眼不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信