Comparison of single absorbable tacker vs. conventional method in fixating the mesh in bilateral inguinal hernia undergoing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP): A randomized control trial study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_161_23
Pouya Mir Mohammad Sadeghi, Amir Hosein Naseri, Azita Shishegar, Hamid Melali, Ali Ashjaei
{"title":"Comparison of single absorbable tacker vs. conventional method in fixating the mesh in bilateral inguinal hernia undergoing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP): A randomized control trial study.","authors":"Pouya Mir Mohammad Sadeghi, Amir Hosein Naseri, Azita Shishegar, Hamid Melali, Ali Ashjaei","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_161_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current study aims to investigate the superior mesh fixation method, single absorbable tacker versus conventional method, in patients undergoing bilateral inguinal hernia repair through the laparoscopic total abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The current randomized clinical trial has been conducted on 81 patients undergoing bilateral hernia repair through TAPP. The patients were randomly assigned into one of the mesh fixation groups including single absorbable tacker (Group S) (<i>n</i> = 41) and conventional method (Group C) (<i>n</i> = 40). All patients were assessed during the hospital stay and 1 month postoperatively to assess the surgery-associated complications and days for return to daily activity. Eura-Hs questionnaire was applied to assess the quality of life (QOL) after hernia surgery during 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration of bilateral inguinal hernia operation (<i>P</i> = 0.067), postoperative urinary catheterization (<i>P</i> = 0.813), and hospital stay duration (<i>P</i> = 0.779) did not differ between the groups; whereas Group C significantly required a longer time for returning to daily activity (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Only a patient in Group C represented hematoma (<i>P</i> = 0.494). Seroma incidence was not statistically different between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.712). Postoperative pain was statistically less in Group S (<i>P</i> < 0.001 for all the assessments). Postoperative QOL within a year after hernia repair revealed an insignificant difference between the groups in general (<i>P</i> > 0.05); however, a pain subscale was significantly less in Group S (<i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings of this study, a single absorbable tacker was generally superior to the conventional method considering its less pre- and postoperative complications. However, the two methods did not differ regarding 1-year follow-up QOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"29 ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11162083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_161_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The current study aims to investigate the superior mesh fixation method, single absorbable tacker versus conventional method, in patients undergoing bilateral inguinal hernia repair through the laparoscopic total abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach.

Materials and methods: The current randomized clinical trial has been conducted on 81 patients undergoing bilateral hernia repair through TAPP. The patients were randomly assigned into one of the mesh fixation groups including single absorbable tacker (Group S) (n = 41) and conventional method (Group C) (n = 40). All patients were assessed during the hospital stay and 1 month postoperatively to assess the surgery-associated complications and days for return to daily activity. Eura-Hs questionnaire was applied to assess the quality of life (QOL) after hernia surgery during 12-month follow-up.

Results: The duration of bilateral inguinal hernia operation (P = 0.067), postoperative urinary catheterization (P = 0.813), and hospital stay duration (P = 0.779) did not differ between the groups; whereas Group C significantly required a longer time for returning to daily activity (P < 0.001). Only a patient in Group C represented hematoma (P = 0.494). Seroma incidence was not statistically different between the two groups (P = 0.712). Postoperative pain was statistically less in Group S (P < 0.001 for all the assessments). Postoperative QOL within a year after hernia repair revealed an insignificant difference between the groups in general (P > 0.05); however, a pain subscale was significantly less in Group S (P = 0.002).

Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, a single absorbable tacker was generally superior to the conventional method considering its less pre- and postoperative complications. However, the two methods did not differ regarding 1-year follow-up QOL.

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)术中固定双侧腹股沟疝网片的单个可吸收夹钳与传统方法的比较:随机对照试验研究。
研究背景本研究旨在探讨在通过腹腔镜全腹膜前(TAPP)方法进行双侧腹股沟疝修补术的患者中,单个可吸收粘扣带与传统方法相比更优越的网片固定方法:本随机临床试验针对 81 名通过 TAPP 进行双侧疝修补术的患者。患者被随机分配到网片固定组(S 组)(41 人)和传统方法组(C 组)(40 人)。所有患者均在住院期间和术后 1 个月接受评估,以评估手术相关并发症和恢复日常活动的天数。在12个月的随访中,采用Eura-Hs问卷评估疝气术后的生活质量(QOL):结果:两组患者的双侧腹股沟疝手术时间(P = 0.067)、术后导尿时间(P = 0.813)和住院时间(P = 0.779)均无差异;而 C 组患者恢复日常活动所需的时间明显更长(P < 0.001)。C 组仅有一名患者出现血肿(P = 0.494)。两组血清肿发生率无统计学差异(P = 0.712)。据统计,S 组术后疼痛较轻(所有评估结果的 P 均小于 0.001)。疝修补术后一年内的术后 QOL 显示,两组之间的总体差异不显著(P > 0.05);但是,S 组的疼痛分量表明显较少(P = 0.002):根据本研究的结果,考虑到术前和术后并发症较少,单个可吸收粘贴器总体上优于传统方法。然而,两种方法在一年的随访 QOL 方面并无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信