A Postpartum Perineal Clinic in Nova Scotia: Characteristics Associated With Attendance and Its Association With Recurrent Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Tears

IF 2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
M. Sullivan BSc , Christy G. Woolcott PhD , E. Pollard BSc, MD , A. Smith BSc, MD
{"title":"A Postpartum Perineal Clinic in Nova Scotia: Characteristics Associated With Attendance and Its Association With Recurrent Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Tears","authors":"M. Sullivan BSc ,&nbsp;Christy G. Woolcott PhD ,&nbsp;E. Pollard BSc, MD ,&nbsp;A. Smith BSc, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The Healthy Recovery after Childbirth Clinic (HRCC) in Nova Scotia provides postpartum care to patients who experience obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). The purpose of this study was to describe characteristics associated with HRCC attendance, characteristics associated with a trial of labour in a subsequent delivery, and OASIS recurrence by HRCC attendance status.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study using the Atlee Perinatal Database and clinical record review included primiparous individuals who sustained an OASIS at IWK Health in Halifax between 2013 and 2020. The χ<sup>2</sup> and Fisher exact tests were performed to compare groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 1041 individuals included, 67% attended HRCC. Attendance increased from 58% in 2013–2015 to 77% in 2019–2020. Younger age (&lt;25 years) and smoking were associated with lower HRCC attendance (<em>P =</em> 0.07 and &lt;0.01, respectively). Other characteristics, including area-level income and driving distance to HRCC, were not associated with attendance (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Of the 439 individuals who had a subsequent delivery, 92% had a trial of labour. Individuals with fourth-degree injury were less likely to attempt a trial of labour than those with third-degree injury (73% vs. 94%, <em>P &lt;</em> 0.01). Of those who delivered vaginally, OASIS recurrence was similar in those who did and did not attend the HRCC (7.5% vs. 6.5%, <em>P =</em> 0.84).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>HRCC attendance was high, but the disparity by age and smoking status suggests some barriers to access that should be explored. Although we found no difference in OASIS recurrence by HRCC attendance, more research with larger samples with adjustment for confounders is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324004018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The Healthy Recovery after Childbirth Clinic (HRCC) in Nova Scotia provides postpartum care to patients who experience obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). The purpose of this study was to describe characteristics associated with HRCC attendance, characteristics associated with a trial of labour in a subsequent delivery, and OASIS recurrence by HRCC attendance status.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study using the Atlee Perinatal Database and clinical record review included primiparous individuals who sustained an OASIS at IWK Health in Halifax between 2013 and 2020. The χ2 and Fisher exact tests were performed to compare groups.

Results

Of the 1041 individuals included, 67% attended HRCC. Attendance increased from 58% in 2013–2015 to 77% in 2019–2020. Younger age (<25 years) and smoking were associated with lower HRCC attendance (P = 0.07 and <0.01, respectively). Other characteristics, including area-level income and driving distance to HRCC, were not associated with attendance (P > 0.05). Of the 439 individuals who had a subsequent delivery, 92% had a trial of labour. Individuals with fourth-degree injury were less likely to attempt a trial of labour than those with third-degree injury (73% vs. 94%, P < 0.01). Of those who delivered vaginally, OASIS recurrence was similar in those who did and did not attend the HRCC (7.5% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.84).

Conclusions

HRCC attendance was high, but the disparity by age and smoking status suggests some barriers to access that should be explored. Although we found no difference in OASIS recurrence by HRCC attendance, more research with larger samples with adjustment for confounders is needed.

新斯科舍省的产后会阴诊所:就诊情况和复发性产科肛门括约肌损伤。
目的:新斯科舍省的产后健康恢复诊所(HRCC)为产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)患者提供产后护理。本研究的目的是描述与到 HRCC 就诊相关的特征、与随后分娩中的试产相关的特征以及与 HRCC 就诊情况相关的肛门括约肌损伤复发情况:这项回顾性队列研究使用了阿特利围产期数据库和临床记录审查,纳入了2013年至2020年期间在哈利法克斯IWK健康中心发生OASIS的初产妇。研究采用卡方检验和费雪精确检验对各组进行比较:在纳入的1041人中,67%参加了HRCC。就诊率从2013-2015年的58%增至2019-2020年的77%。年龄较小 ( 0.05)。在随后分娩的 439 人中,92% 进行了试产。四度损伤者尝试试产的可能性低于三度损伤者(73% vs 94%,P < 0.01)。在阴道分娩的产妇中,参加和未参加HRCC的产妇的OASIS复发率相似(7.5% vs 6.5%,P = 0.84):结论:参加 HRCC 的比例很高,但不同年龄和吸烟状况之间的差异表明,参加 HRCC 存在一些障碍,应加以探讨。虽然我们发现参加 HRCC 的患者在 OASIS 复发率方面没有差异,但仍需对更大样本进行更多研究,并对混杂因素进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
302
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信