International Variations in Adherence to Quality Metrics for Locoregional Prostate Cancer.

Abstract

Background and objective: Adherence to guideline recommendations can improve the quality of care for patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Our aim was to assess adherence to guidelines for locoregional PCa by international region.

Methods: The study cohort comprised patients diagnosed with locoregional PCa in the 10-country Movember TrueNTH Global Registry (n = 62 688; 2013-2022). We assessed adherence to four quality metrics: (1) active surveillance for low-risk PCa; (2) definitive treatment within 12 mo of diagnosis for unfavorable-risk PCa; (3) no staging imaging for favorable-risk PCa; and (4) staging imaging for unfavorable-risk PCa. For χ² analyses, we combined the three most recent years of data entered by region for each outcome, with adjustment for multiple tests (p = 0.05 ÷ 4 = 0.0125). We also conducted multivariable logistic regression and temporal analyses.

Key findings and limitations: Active surveillance rates for low-risk PCa ranged from 85% in Australia/New Zealand (vs USA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.042, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.740-1.520) to 14% in Central Europe (aOR 0.028, 95% CI 0.022-0.036). For patients with unfavorable-risk disease, the highest uptake rate for treatment within 12 mo of diagnosis was in Central Europe (98%; aOR 2.885, 95% CI 1.260-6.603), compared to 70% in Italy (aOR 0.031, 95%CI 0.014-0.072). The proportion of patients with favorable-risk disease who did not undergo imaging ranged from 94% in the USA to 30% in Italy (aOR 0.004, 95% CI 0.002-0.008), while the rate of imaging for unfavorable-risk PCa ranged from 8% in Hong Kong (aOR 65.222, 95% CI 43.676-97.398) to 39% in the USA (all χ²p < 0.0125). Regional temporal trends also varied.

Conclusions and clinical implications: In this international study comparing adherence to quality care metrics for the quality of care for locoregional PCa, we identified regional variance, possibly because of regional differences in cultural attitudes and health care structures. These benchmarks highlight opportunities for interventions to improve adherence to evidence-based guidelines.

Patient summary: Our study shows that adherence to recommended management goals for patients with prostate cancer varies greatly by global region.