Soo Hyun Lee, Omer Yilmaz, Nandan Padmanabha, Vikram Deshpande, Osman Yilmaz
{"title":"Assessing venous invasion in stage II colon cancer: optimal elastin stains and survival analysis.","authors":"Soo Hyun Lee, Omer Yilmaz, Nandan Padmanabha, Vikram Deshpande, Osman Yilmaz","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2024-209550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Venous invasion (VI) in colorectal carcinoma influences treatment strategies, especially in early stages. Despite elastin staining effectiveness in detecting VI, guidelines for its routine application, including the optimal number of slides for staining, are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Elastin staining was performed for VI assessment in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Patients were categorised into two groups: single elastin stain group (SEG, n=248) and multiple elastin stain group (MEG, n=204).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average number of elastin-stained blocks was 2±1.7, increasing to 3.3±1.9 in MEG. VI detection was significantly higher in patients in MEG (50.5%) compared with SEG (37.0%) (p=0.004). VI detection rate was higher in MEG (63.7%) than in SEG (46.0%) among patients with stage III-IV disease (p=0.011), but did not significantly differ among patients with stage I-II disease. Staining two blocks improved VI detection without additional gains from more stains. Compared with elastin performed on a single block, VI detected by elastin stain on two or more blocks did not significantly impact progression-free or disease-free survival with stage II patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Employing two elastin stains on separate blocks significantly enhances VI detection in colorectal carcinoma without additional benefits from more extensive staining. This study suggests that while increasing sensitivity for VI detection, staining beyond two blocks may not benefit prognostication and could be counterproductive, warranting further research. We emphasise the need for strategic use of the elastin stain and cautious interpretation of the increased detection sensitivity of multiple elastin stains.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-209550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Venous invasion (VI) in colorectal carcinoma influences treatment strategies, especially in early stages. Despite elastin staining effectiveness in detecting VI, guidelines for its routine application, including the optimal number of slides for staining, are limited.
Methods: Elastin staining was performed for VI assessment in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Patients were categorised into two groups: single elastin stain group (SEG, n=248) and multiple elastin stain group (MEG, n=204).
Results: The average number of elastin-stained blocks was 2±1.7, increasing to 3.3±1.9 in MEG. VI detection was significantly higher in patients in MEG (50.5%) compared with SEG (37.0%) (p=0.004). VI detection rate was higher in MEG (63.7%) than in SEG (46.0%) among patients with stage III-IV disease (p=0.011), but did not significantly differ among patients with stage I-II disease. Staining two blocks improved VI detection without additional gains from more stains. Compared with elastin performed on a single block, VI detected by elastin stain on two or more blocks did not significantly impact progression-free or disease-free survival with stage II patients.
Conclusions: Employing two elastin stains on separate blocks significantly enhances VI detection in colorectal carcinoma without additional benefits from more extensive staining. This study suggests that while increasing sensitivity for VI detection, staining beyond two blocks may not benefit prognostication and could be counterproductive, warranting further research. We emphasise the need for strategic use of the elastin stain and cautious interpretation of the increased detection sensitivity of multiple elastin stains.
目的:结直肠癌的静脉侵犯(VI)会影响治疗策略,尤其是早期阶段。尽管弹性蛋白染色能有效检测VI,但其常规应用指南(包括染色的最佳切片数量)却很有限:方法:对结直肠腺癌患者进行弹性蛋白染色以评估VI。患者分为两组:单一弹性蛋白染色组(SEG,n=248)和多重弹性蛋白染色组(MEG,n=204):结果:弹性蛋白染色块的平均数量为 2±1.7,在 MEG 中增至 3.3±1.9。MEG患者的VI检出率(50.5%)明显高于SEG(37.0%)(P=0.004)。在 III-IV 期疾病患者中,MEG 的 VI 检出率(63.7%)高于 SEG(46.0%)(p=0.011),但在 I-II 期疾病患者中没有明显差异。对两个区块进行染色可提高 VI 的检测率,但染色次数越多,检测率越高。与在单个区块上进行弹性蛋白染色相比,在两个或更多区块上进行弹性蛋白染色所检测到的VI对II期患者的无进展或无病生存率没有明显影响:结论:在不同区块上采用两种弹性蛋白染色可显著提高结直肠癌的VI检测率,而更广泛的染色则不会带来额外的益处。这项研究表明,在提高VI检测灵敏度的同时,超过两个区块的染色可能不会对预后产生益处,反而会适得其反,值得进一步研究。我们强调有必要战略性地使用弹性蛋白染色,并谨慎解释多重弹性蛋白染色所提高的检测灵敏度。