The increasing authorship trend in neuroscience: A scientometric analysis across 11 countries

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Ann Paul , Mariella Segreti , Pierpaolo Pani , Emiliano Brunamonti , Aldo Genovesio
{"title":"The increasing authorship trend in neuroscience: A scientometric analysis across 11 countries","authors":"Ann Paul ,&nbsp;Mariella Segreti ,&nbsp;Pierpaolo Pani ,&nbsp;Emiliano Brunamonti ,&nbsp;Aldo Genovesio","doi":"10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous studies have demonstrated an increasing trend of the number of authors across various fields over the years. This trend has been attributed to the necessity for larger collaborations and, at times, to ethical issues regarding authorship attribution. Our study focuses on the evolution of authorship trends in the field of Neuroscience. We conducted our analysis based on a dataset containing 580,782 neuroscience publications produced from 2000 to 2022, focusing on the publications within the Group of ten (G10) countries. Using a matrix-based methodology, we extracted and analyzed the average number of authors per country. Our findings reveal a consistent rise in authorship across all G10 countries over the past two decades. Italy emerged with the highest average number of authors, while France stood out for experiencing the most significant increase, particularly in the last decade. The countries with the lowest number of authors per publication were the USA, UK and Canada. Differences between countries could result from variations in the size of collaboration between researchers in different countries. Additionally, these differences may depend on utilitarian considerations aimed at receiving higher scores in the individual evaluation of their own work. We propose that a normalization procedure for the number of authors should be implemented to ensure a fair evaluation of researchers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13195,"journal":{"name":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Pages 52-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667242124000563/pdfft?md5=c945153f3bc86ec009bc60a7972a3b1d&pid=1-s2.0-S2667242124000563-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667242124000563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated an increasing trend of the number of authors across various fields over the years. This trend has been attributed to the necessity for larger collaborations and, at times, to ethical issues regarding authorship attribution. Our study focuses on the evolution of authorship trends in the field of Neuroscience. We conducted our analysis based on a dataset containing 580,782 neuroscience publications produced from 2000 to 2022, focusing on the publications within the Group of ten (G10) countries. Using a matrix-based methodology, we extracted and analyzed the average number of authors per country. Our findings reveal a consistent rise in authorship across all G10 countries over the past two decades. Italy emerged with the highest average number of authors, while France stood out for experiencing the most significant increase, particularly in the last decade. The countries with the lowest number of authors per publication were the USA, UK and Canada. Differences between countries could result from variations in the size of collaboration between researchers in different countries. Additionally, these differences may depend on utilitarian considerations aimed at receiving higher scores in the individual evaluation of their own work. We propose that a normalization procedure for the number of authors should be implemented to ensure a fair evaluation of researchers.

神经科学的作者人数呈上升趋势:对 11 个国家的科学计量分析
以往的研究表明,多年来各领域的作者人数呈上升趋势。这一趋势被归因于更大规模合作的必要性,有时也与作者署名的伦理问题有关。我们的研究重点是神经科学领域作者身份的演变趋势。我们的分析基于一个数据集,该数据集包含 2000 年至 2022 年间发表的 580,782 篇神经科学论文,重点关注十国集团(G10)国家内的论文。我们采用基于矩阵的方法,提取并分析了每个国家的平均作者人数。我们的研究结果表明,在过去二十年中,所有十国集团国家的作者人数持续上升。意大利的作者平均人数最高,而法国的作者平均人数增幅最大,尤其是在过去十年中。每篇论文作者人数最少的国家是美国、英国和加拿大。国家之间的差异可能是由于不同国家研究人员之间的合作规模不同造成的。此外,这些差异也可能是出于功利的考虑,目的是在个人工作评估中获得更高的分数。我们建议对作者人数进行标准化处理,以确保对研究人员进行公平评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IBRO Neuroscience Reports
IBRO Neuroscience Reports Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信