[Epidemiological and clinical profile of ocular eviscerations in northern Algeria, about 136 cases].

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the existence of well codified indications, the performance of mutilating surgery in ophthalmology is not an easy decision to take due to the aesthetic and moral damages that patients may suffer. This surgery should be considered as a last resort in the case of a non-functional, painful and unsightly eye or in the presence of an oncological involvement and after all conservative alternatives have been exhausted. This study aims to define the factors making it possible to favor ocular evisceration, which is the least mutilating of the above-mentioned surgeries, by determining the epidemiological and clinical aspects of the patients. In addition, the results of the study will serve as a starting point for epidemiological surveillance and will guide preventive activities and the fight against blindness.

Material & method: We conducted an exhaustive retrospective study of medical records from the archives of the ophthalmology departments of the Dr. Tidjani Damardji University Hospital Center in Tlemcen, the Specialized Hospital Establishment in ophthalmology of Oran Hamou Boutlelis, the Specialized Hospital Establishment in ophthalmology of Oran Front de mer and the University Hospital Center of Bejaia (unit Franz Fanon), in order to specify the epidemiological-clinical profile of patients who have undergone an ocular evisceration in the north of Algeria from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2014.

Results & discussion: We have identified 136 patients, representing an admission rate of 0,13% in all these services. We noted a slight male predominance with an estimated sex-ratio of 1.4. Evisceration was carried out mainly following an ocular trauma in 39% of cases. The surgical technique performed in all patients is a classic non-conservative evisceration of "four quadrants" or "four squares" under general anesthesia in 55.9% of cases. Post-operative complications were found in 19.8% of patients in our series, the main one being exteriorization of the intra-scleral implant in 9.5% of cases. This rate corresponds to the data in the literature, with figures between 0 and 67%. This complication may be in relation with the experience or even the competence of the surgeon. Accessibility to ocularists and the quality of prosthetic equipment were also studied. All the data collected were compared with data from the international medical literature. Our study carried out in the north of Algeria on ocular eviscerations, allowed us to deduce that this surgery is rarely carried out in ophthalmology. Its main indications are post-traumatic and post-infectious.

Conclusion: The prevention of mutilating surgeries requires early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of ophthalmological pathologies and trauma. Losing an eye is always experienced as a tragedy and can be devastating at any age, affecting self-image and self-esteem. Psychological support is therefore essential.