{"title":"Pain-suppressed consumption of highly palatable liquid in rats.","authors":"Rebecca M Craft","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study determined whether consumption of a highly palatable liquid is a reliable measure of inflammatory pain and antinociception in male and female rats. After a 10-day acquisition period, the impact of intraplantar oil vs. complete Freund adjuvant (CFA) on consumption of vanilla-flavored Ensure was assessed, with a sipper tube height 12 or 19 cm above the floor. CFA significantly decreased Ensure consumption, which completely recovered within 4-7 days to levels in oil-treated controls; neither sex nor sipper tube height significantly influenced Ensure consumption. CFA also significantly suppressed Ensure consumption in rats not exposed to the 10-day acquisition period, but only in males. To test the predictive validity of Ensure consumption as a measure of pain, separate rats were pretreated with a vehicle, an opioid, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or a cannabinoid the day after CFA treatment. Morphine and ibuprofen significantly attenuated CFA-suppressed drinking in at least one sex, and tetrahydrocannabinol did not. Neither ibuprofen nor tetrahydrocannabinol significantly altered drinking in oil-injected, 'pain-free' controls, but morphine increased drinking. These results demonstrate that CFA decreases consumption of a highly palatable liquid regardless of previous exposure (training) to the consumption procedure, but only in males. Although standard analgesics attenuate CFA-suppressed drinking, nonspecific hyperphagic effects can confound the interpretation of results. Thus, consumption of a highly palatable liquid is not an optimal measure for candidate analgesic screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"263-268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study determined whether consumption of a highly palatable liquid is a reliable measure of inflammatory pain and antinociception in male and female rats. After a 10-day acquisition period, the impact of intraplantar oil vs. complete Freund adjuvant (CFA) on consumption of vanilla-flavored Ensure was assessed, with a sipper tube height 12 or 19 cm above the floor. CFA significantly decreased Ensure consumption, which completely recovered within 4-7 days to levels in oil-treated controls; neither sex nor sipper tube height significantly influenced Ensure consumption. CFA also significantly suppressed Ensure consumption in rats not exposed to the 10-day acquisition period, but only in males. To test the predictive validity of Ensure consumption as a measure of pain, separate rats were pretreated with a vehicle, an opioid, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or a cannabinoid the day after CFA treatment. Morphine and ibuprofen significantly attenuated CFA-suppressed drinking in at least one sex, and tetrahydrocannabinol did not. Neither ibuprofen nor tetrahydrocannabinol significantly altered drinking in oil-injected, 'pain-free' controls, but morphine increased drinking. These results demonstrate that CFA decreases consumption of a highly palatable liquid regardless of previous exposure (training) to the consumption procedure, but only in males. Although standard analgesics attenuate CFA-suppressed drinking, nonspecific hyperphagic effects can confound the interpretation of results. Thus, consumption of a highly palatable liquid is not an optimal measure for candidate analgesic screening.
期刊介绍：
Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
