Skilled emigration in a world of variety

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS

Research in Economics Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1016/j.rie.2024.100979

Subhasree Basak , Kausik Gupta

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Upgradation of export product quality and product diversification are two crucial determinants of the economic growth of developing countries. Both depend heavily on the endowment and quality of the skilled labor. However, one of the challenges developing countries face is the emigration of skilled labor. In this paper, we intend to explore the effect of skilled labor emigration on the export product quality, the number of varieties produced (extensive margin), and the amount of production (intensive margin). To do so, we provide a theoretical framework followed by empirical evidence. Results suggest that export product quality deteriorates with an outflow of skilled labor. Moreover, the number of varieties produced by the domestically specialized manufacturing or domestic service sectors falls but the total amount of production increases. This product diversification at the domestic level has a similar impact on export diversification when we have skilled emigration. The theoretical results have been examined empirically in this paper.

查看原文本刊更多论文

多样化世界中的技术移民

出口产品质量升级和产品多样化是发展中国家经济增长的两个重要决定因素。这两个因素在很大程度上取决于熟练劳动力的禀赋和质量。然而，发展中国家面临的挑战之一就是熟练劳动力的外流。在本文中，我们打算探讨熟练劳动力移民对出口产品质量、生产品种数量（广义边际）和生产量（密集边际）的影响。为此，我们提供了一个理论框架，并随后提供了经验证据。结果表明，随着熟练劳动力的外流，出口产品质量会下降。此外，国内专业制造业或国内服务业生产的品种数量减少，但生产总量增加。在技术移民的情况下，国内产品多样化对出口多样化也会产生类似的影响。本文对理论结果进行了实证研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Research in Economics ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

89 days

期刊介绍： Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.